wsj takes trump to task

Let me clarify. I was not arguing against any of the links you posted in that reply, otherwise I would have cited them. Just providing a clear case of well known bias/corruption. As for your bias; twas a commentary on your participation here as a whole.

Carry on with your winning... I wasn't aware it was a competition.

Edit:
Misread failing. Anyway, impossible to convince someone who refuse to look, no?
What are you trying to convince me of? My bias? Media corruption? It's not like I'm ignoring your posts, and you don't know what videos I've watched or not. But you have to at the very least tell me what's your friggin POINT?!?

Anyways, I have to go win at watching the Blue Jays now.
 
Last edited:
What are you trying to convince me of? My bias? Media corruption? It's not like I'm ignoring your posts, and you don't know what videos I've watched or not. But you have to at the very least tell me what's your friggin POINT?!?

Anyways, I have to go win at watching the Blue Jays now.

That there are reasonable alternatives to the views you hold.. Don't worry about it. In the end the alternatives I present are for anyone who wishes to indulge; you've made it clear you won't be bothered, and neither am I.
 
What are you trying to convince me of? My bias? Media corruption? It's not like I'm ignoring your posts, and you don't know what videos I've watched or not. But you have to at the very least tell me what's your friggin POINT?!?

Anyways, I have to go win at watching the Blue Jays now.

That there are reasonable alternatives to the views you hold.. Don't worry about it. In the end the alternatives I present are for anyone who wishes to indulge; you've made it clear you won't be bothered, and neither am I.


Maybe you two should meet up for drinks and dinner to discuss and person and see where it goes from there.
Just sayin'
 
the plot thickens

http://www.globalresearch.ca/on-the...urce=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles

A Hillary Clinton presidency is being pushed down the collective throats of humanity with massive psy-op, a global “wag the dog”. The end game of the elites—nuclear war with Russia, the long-awaited conquest of the Eurasian subcontinent, and a criminal succession must not be derailed. A Trump victory and a popular revolt pose threats to this end game, and must be thwarted at all costs.
 

Globalresearch? That's the news equivalent of posting a link to Mercola or Naturalnews in a vaccine discussion thread.

Here, read this about that website.


Anyhow, for something completely different....it looks like Hillary might actually have a chance at winning rootin-tootin big sky gun country Texas. That will be a huge bit of ammunition for Trumps "rigged election" claims, because everyone knows nobody in Texas would vote for the liberals, right...even when their other option is a raging narcissistic misogynist with a tendency towards childish angry outbursts?
 
Read about why it sucks on this other blog website! lol

Does it matter where the factual information originates so long as the relevant citations to back it up are present?
 
dude, it's the romper room & is a hoot compared to jail, cnn or msm

I don't really care where one gets their news from as long as it's factual. If you're getting your news from a quack website that believes and perpetuates conspiracy theories and such...is it really news? Or a waste of time?
 
I don't really care where one gets their news from as long as it's factual. If you're getting your news from a quack website that believes and perpetuates conspiracy theories and such...is it really news? Or a waste of time?
facts? what/who's facts? how do you define news? credible news? sources? cnn? msm?
 
Last edited:
.even when their other option is a raging narcissistic misogynist with a tendency towards childish angry outbursts?
that a fact? and hillary is a saint, the champion of women, just leave her hubby stuff & her direct role in it out of it all

or, just ignore those facts on record,

trump claims the elections are rigged, or "won't say" blah blah ..election results, big deal

i luv the russian hackers trump connections pure bs so far, argued with any legitimacy, gimme a break, as far as facts go to that, all i've seen so far is 2 words "high probability" ?????

and then the hillary "he goes low, i go high" lmao, the words are a fact, the reality another
 
Last edited:
that a fact? and hillary is a saint, the champion of women, just leave her hubby stuff & her direct role in it out of it all

or, just ignore those facts on record,

trump claims the elections are rigged, or "won't say" blah blah ..election results, big deal

i luv the russian hackers trump connections pure bs so far, argued with any legitimacy, gimme a break, as far as facts go to that, all i've seen so far is 2 words "high probability" ?????

and then the hillary "he goes low, i go high" lmao, the words are a fact, the reality another

Trump should have said (to the voters), see that's what I am talking about. The Government knows we are being hacked and they can't stop it yet.
Ask Clinton, well maybe the hackers deleted your emails, yes? What is she going to say, no not the hackers...I did...lol or if she says yes maybe it was the hackers then Trump says are you serious, the Secretary of Defense being hacked and you want us to trust you to keep us safe.
Do we trust Clinton to keep us safe. Does this make sense to you folks...she can't keep her own emails safe?:lmao:
 
Funny thing is Trump could have won this thing easily if he just stayed on the high road and said things he does...she has been in govt for 30 years, nothing getting done...I have been complaining about govt for 20 years and now I am going to stop complaining and step in to fix our country. I am a billionaire, I don't need to do this but I am doing it because I want to leave our children something better.

I built business's, I will get the other patriot billionaires to come together and make the country better.
Provide healthcare plans, provide education plans, job plans...pretty much covers the majority of voters.

Instead he ran rough shot and pandered to the extreme... (Trumpy)dummy:D
 
Yup, Trump is his own worst enemy. Pick any Republican from the last few elections. I don't think a single one of them would have had trouble defeating HC; she really is that bad.
 
For me, I see it with my own eyes. Everyone on the planet is a liar except me.

Agreed. You have to take it all in and make up your own mind based on the best information available. Blind faith because institution... not my thing.
 
Yup, Trump is his own worst enemy. Pick any Republican from the last few elections. I don't think a single one of them would have had trouble defeating HC; she really is that bad.

I disagree. Women would vote for Clinton instead of bible thumper types...Rowe vs. Wade

Trump was the right guy for now because he is an outsider. That is/was his allure.
 
I watched the debate last night...Trump was a gong show, stumbling from one nonsensical rant to another all while munging the english language to the point of hilarity sometimes, while Hillary came across as professional and articulate.

If you were a US voter who was still on the fence, last nights performance really should have made up your mind for you.
 
Back
Top Bottom