knucklesound
Well-known member
[video=youtube;eZVv2AOCnaA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZVv2AOCnaA[/video]
wsj takes trump to task
- Thread starter yodude
- Start date
^^^
That's a syndicated puff piece. Someone just doesn't understand how syndication works and seems to think there's something nefarious going on.
Add laugh track and tinfoil hat wearing Youtubers, and bam, profit.
That's a syndicated puff piece. Someone just doesn't understand how syndication works and seems to think there's something nefarious going on.
Add laugh track and tinfoil hat wearing Youtubers, and bam, profit.
Whether the allegations are real or not I think the Democrats are playing the cards well. However even if DT didn't do all the locker room / assault stuff he has enough other faults to make him unwanted as POTUS IMO. Hillary is no prize either. Sorta getting robbed vs getting robbed by a crack addict with an Uzi.
Funny stuff guys... these types of allegations have been going on for years but when you are rich and powerful the rules tend not to apply to you (sort of like what he was saying in the hot mic tape....).
Here is one from earlier this year:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/31634105...pstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits#fullscreen
Now this one got very little traction on the Dems propaganda side, my guess is because Bill used to hang out with these pervs, it was covered in the media. It is the second filing because she self filled and had errors the first time. So it was not timed on purpose...
Now for the comedy... looks like he is starting a Trump TV channel. Of course he is saying the media is biased and on the take, it is a plug for his up and coming "news" network, who again are the sheep here? This con man is just running a con.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/19/media/donald-trump-tv/index.html
In the end, I bet he doesn't even want the job, just about self promotion and setting up the next con.
Here is one from earlier this year:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/31634105...pstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits#fullscreen
Now this one got very little traction on the Dems propaganda side, my guess is because Bill used to hang out with these pervs, it was covered in the media. It is the second filing because she self filled and had errors the first time. So it was not timed on purpose...
Now for the comedy... looks like he is starting a Trump TV channel. Of course he is saying the media is biased and on the take, it is a plug for his up and coming "news" network, who again are the sheep here? This con man is just running a con.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/19/media/donald-trump-tv/index.html
In the end, I bet he doesn't even want the job, just about self promotion and setting up the next con.
Agreed; though as good a hand as the demo's have at the moment, one has to wonder what congressional backlash may be coming with all the underlying scandals surrounding HC. Is it possible the Republicans are staying mum atm, resigned to the fact the election is likely lost?
The thought has crossed my mind..
Originally Posted by backmarkerducati
In the end, I bet he doesn't even want the job, just about self promotion and setting up the next con.
Well if he does another tv show look at all the new followers he has, he can do internet media also.
They will line up to give him a tv show.
Oh yay, Fox News "reality edition".
I made a clear argument that defined the terms I was using and demonstrated evidence in support of my point according to those terms, with links to support each claim. That's what it looks like to present an argument.
You say you don't expect me to trouble myself with following your links and that's obvious. I'm not going to try and make your argument for you. Saying "many media are corrupt" with a YouTube link isn't an argument. I could watch that video and come up with hundreds of arguments that aren't the one you're avoiding to make.
Here's a bolder criticism; you're unable to make an argument. Prove me wrong. Show me what evidence you use to back your view that many media are corrupt. Then if you make a cogent argument I may be inclined to follow your links if I feel that I need to verify your evidence.
-D-
Banned
modified for you
yodude
Banned
https://www.google.ca/search?q=corr...69i57.1428007908j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
https://www.google.ca/webhp?hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiPl6GDiuTPAhWK14MKHbhjDLUQPAgD#hl=en&q=dishonestly
all i see on cnn & all you have to do is click in once in awhile for a few mnts, is mostly trump trash, gimme a break
he gets hammered, the other side gets glossed over, it's not gonna fly regardless of the election results
msm might as well have become babbling irrelevant dinosaurs & mostly a waste of time
the main appeal from trump is challenging all of status quo, that many are not only clearly fed up with but can also easily find real information on their own
Last edited:
Maybe the status quo is not so bad if the "appeal" is challenging it with trickle down economics (technically supply side economics), from a bigoted, sexual predator that has six bankruptcies? All the presses fault...the poor victim.
The only way he will make America "grate" again is if he bans shredded cheese.
It is all a con to promote his new TV news channel.
The only way he will make America "grate" again is if he bans shredded cheese.
It is all a con to promote his new TV news channel.
I'm not arguing lol. Just presented a rather compelling documentary to back up my point. You decided not to watch and then rip on about my motivations might be. I've been clear from the start; I AM NOT HERE TO SUPPORT TRUMP. You guys are doing a fine job pointing out his flaws... what could I add? Instead, I'm just putting a little light on the other candidate. Sue me.
A little insight for you. I grew up in the Clinton Presidency, and was a big supporter back then, and feel slightly naive for doing so; I preferred Gore to Bush (before the inconvenient fluff piece of course); Obama's been fine, but I have to laugh when he's presented the Nobel Peace Prize for instance (drone strike for all haha); I've voted for every political party in Canada at some point in my life, NDP last federal, Harper before that...
So whats the point? My views come from who the candidate is, and what policy they propose, in the moment, regardless of party... I get the distinct feeling your a life long center left voter (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong) and we're butting heads here for no reason other than that.
-D-
Banned
Obama getting the Nobel Peace Prize was a move to keep him from being another Bush.
If I give you this award and place the spotlight on you from day 1 then I have hung the cross around your neck for public display.
It's now up to you to protect/destroy your reputation/legacy.
The votes for Trump is not for Trump but simply protest against Clinton and Democrats.
The numbers are there to defeat Clinton if all the 'Trump types' go and vote.
If I give you this award and place the spotlight on you from day 1 then I have hung the cross around your neck for public display.
It's now up to you to protect/destroy your reputation/legacy.
The votes for Trump is not for Trump but simply protest against Clinton and Democrats.
The numbers are there to defeat Clinton if all the 'Trump types' go and vote.
You are arguing Neil. That's why you have a point you're trying to convince me is valid. You're just failing at it.
BTW I don't know why it's so important for you to demonstrate your lack of bias, or my reliance on bias. I've never said anything about bias. I've only been making a point about corruption in the media.
BTW I don't know why it's so important for you to demonstrate your lack of bias, or my reliance on bias. I've never said anything about bias. I've only been making a point about corruption in the media.
Let me clarify. I was not arguing against any of the links you posted in that reply, otherwise I would have cited them. Just providing a clear case of well known bias/corruption. As for your bias; twas a commentary on your participation here as a whole.
Carry on with your winning... I wasn't aware it was a competition.
Edit: Misread failing. Anyway, impossible to convince someone who refuse to look, no?
Last edited:
He can't do that without the womens vote and if he can get all his supporters out. Only problem is he may have shot himself in the foot by calling the election "rigged". All the hillbillys will be saying it's worthless voting since the vote is rigged already.
