You've misunderstood her quote. What she is saying that she wouldnt cure the leaper for money, but for love. This means that money doesnt motivate her. What it doesnt say is that she wouldnt be just as successful if she had lots of money to help that leper.
Once again, please tell me how any of this disproves the fact that if she had money she would be much more successful in her endeavours? If Mother Teresa had a billion dollars, do you seriously believe she wouldnt have been able to do far more than if she had naught? Seriously??
Again, who cares what one or two or three people believe, think or feel. Its irrelevant. Anecdotal evidence is nonsense.
The rest of this post has been covered over and over again, I dont know why it keeps going over your head. Without money you cannot do the things that make you happy no matter how much personal discovery you undergo to find out what makes you happy. If you realize that making wicker baskets makes you happy, without the money to buy the materials you wont be able to make those baskets and you wont be happy. Again...at the end of the day, you need money to indulge in whatever you feel makes you happy.
Discussing the pursuit of money is another discussion, but again without money for the vast majority of people on this planet it equates to unhappiness. This isnt an opinion, its a fact, backed up by numerous studies and research. To simply disprove this, give up every cent you have, every possession you have and then get back to us about your happiness....with like a carrier pigeon (actually no they need to be fed)...so you'd have to use smoke signals or something.
Last edited:
