Re: BY By Tommy boy Ford kicked out!!
And the way that I see it, a leader doesn't have to be a spendthrift. You can motivate without picking the pocket. Miller may have tried to drag people along with his vision, but his vision didn't exactly provide for an efficient, liveable city. His priorities seemed slanted to bread and circuses, in aid of reelection, instead of repair and support of an aging infrastructure.
Given the choice between a crumbling infrastructure and more personal money, or crumbling infrastructure and less money, the choice is obvious. Both are wrong, but one is less wrong. Torontonians deserve better than two wrong choices.
While I agree with what you said, I think you're addressing a different point than ZX600.
The way I see it is that governments are leaders of their region (city, province, nation...), and people are the products of those regions. Conservatives expect (justifiably) a bit of a firewall between themselves and the leaders, in the form of the laws of the land. So government should never be a leader of the people, but a leader of their jurisdiction. The way skip described the role of a mayor as being a leader of a million people kind of breached that firewall, and I believe that was what prompted ZX600's reaction.
This is the problem of overzealous progressives; trying to grow their vision of the city so quickly that residents feel dragged along against their will, rather than the city expanding beneath them so they can grow within it. This provokes the only 'rational' reaction which is to elect a government that cripples itself with budget cuts so that it can't meddle as much in their lives. Getting a little bit of gold dust in their hands is also a nice incentive, but the problem here is that the golden sparkle distracts them from noticing that their city is crumbling underneath them.
Me, I preferred to be dragged along by the likes of Miller (within reason) than to allow the city to be neglected by another Ford, but my preference is in part because I shared the vision of the city that we were being dragged into. But Miller dig drag people, particularly with car restrictions like the VRT and Jarvis bike lanes. So there was bound to be at least a bit of backlash. Turns out there was enough of a backlash (plus all the other qualities that Ford possessed over the competition) that we ended up with this disaster.
All that to say YES, a strong leader is necessary but (s)he should be a leader of the city, not of the citizens.
And the way that I see it, a leader doesn't have to be a spendthrift. You can motivate without picking the pocket. Miller may have tried to drag people along with his vision, but his vision didn't exactly provide for an efficient, liveable city. His priorities seemed slanted to bread and circuses, in aid of reelection, instead of repair and support of an aging infrastructure.
Given the choice between a crumbling infrastructure and more personal money, or crumbling infrastructure and less money, the choice is obvious. Both are wrong, but one is less wrong. Torontonians deserve better than two wrong choices.