Do you sleep with a Thesaurus under your pillow ? you chuck around 50 cent words like they are going out of style..
anyways.. I think the dudes done a pretty good job, and at the end of the day, I really dont give a crap what he does in his spare time.
Imagine if your employer caught wind that you were out in the back alley cookin up, or a Photographer caught you coming out of a Gay Club
should you quit your job ? but that wont happen, becasue you are a nobody, that doesnt have 100,000 people wanting you to fail and lose your job, you dont have a camera on you 24/7.
If you did, every single thing you did would be looked at, and examined. I think the guy has done a pretty good job, and I think he's probably better than the rest, as well.
the truth here is, you love to whine and complain about everyone. You've already mentioned that you dont remember who you voted for, and that all 3 were bad.
so really, it doesnt matter who would be in office, you'd still complain.
I can't find a way of saying what's on my mind without the 50 cent words. I guess that's something I could learn from Ford, he was plain talking yet everyone understood him.Do you sleep with a Thesaurus under your pillow ? you chuck around 50 cent words like they are going out of style..
anyways.. I think the dudes done a pretty good job, and at the end of the day, I really dont give a crap what he does in his spare time.
Imagine if your employer caught wind that you were out in the back alley cookin up, or a Photographer caught you coming out of a Gay Club
should you quit your job ? but that wont happen, becasue you are a nobody, that doesnt have 100,000 people wanting you to fail and lose your job, you dont have a camera on you 24/7.
If you did, every single thing you did would be looked at, and examined. I think the guy has done a pretty good job, and I think he's probably better than the rest, as well.
the truth here is, you love to whine and complain about everyone. You've already mentioned that you dont remember who you voted for, and that all 3 were bad.
so really, it doesnt matter who would be in office, you'd still complain.
The point being that the explanation was reactionary, the same way the media say "stock markets ar up today because blah blah blah..." they actually have no idea and I illustrated why. If I'm wrong, show me how.
What does that have to do with anything I said?
It matters not one bit how the Star went after Ford.
There was a story there and it finally came out. They were right. Everyone who voted for a fat, hypocritical lying piece of **** crackhead were wrong. Only they'll never admit they were wrong. But then look at who they hold up as a role model. A fat, hypocritical lying piece of **** crackhead.
Next step for Ford: Publicize a push towards legalizing marijuana to get most people that use drugs to re-elect him
I wonder if this will all blow over like the rest of the scandals against Ford...I think it will just quiet down and we will move on with time.
Personally I don't see the people of Toronto rallying up in arms to get Ford to step down.
Question for Ford supporters:What would it take for you to drop your support for Ford and change your opinion of his suitability to remain in office, or is your support unconditional?
They are CONSERVATIVE voters, he is just their candidate.
Question for Ford supporters:What would it take for you to drop your support for Ford and change your opinion of his suitability to remain in office, or is your support unconditional?
Ford is, and always was, the anti-hero. That's why I voted for him. The day he starts acting like a typical politician (i.e., everyone else on Council) is the day I stop supporting him.
Ah yes, the argument as moving target. it became evident quite early on, through reliable polling agencies, that Ford's support was split on geographic lines. That's not reactionary; it's pointing out a trend.
If they were only pointing out a trend then reports would simply have mentioned the geographic divide. But they pretended to explain it with a storyline that doesn't stand scrutiny.
By the way, my point isn't any kind of "moving target" if it has no effect on the substance of your reply. Whether the explanation for Ford's win was conjured up by the media on the day of his election or a month before is irrelevant to my point and you know it.