Bicyclists should have insurance...
- Thread starter chiller
- Start date
I said whole not a hole.
D should be stumping for a stunting law for bicycles, too. It only makes sense.
-D-
Banned
uhm and there is another contradiction...they are supposed to follow the rules of the road...right?
I noticed none of you answered my questions.
How does one follow the rules of the road when they were never tested yet they are told they can be on the road?
If you are on the road they can charge you if they wanted because ignorance of the law is not a legal excuse.
But back to step one, you tell these ppl they can be on the road without having to demonstrate basic road knowledge.
Sounds like a well thought out system there.
#goebikes
-D-
Banned
Let's not forget the de facto abuse which inevitable follows the implementation of the often poorly written legislation; not to mention the all to common practice of passing other less popular changes under cover of public out cry.
Yep, the law passed because they tugged along the idea that street racers are running amok killing women and children..... then 172 is implemented and the only people getting busted are soccer moms in minivans and Random Joes driving to work doing 150kmh. But yeah, street racing!
At least this thread describes very neatly the oddball mindset of typical sheeple who demand legislative action for the dumbest reasons possible :lol: (not pointing any fingers)
At least this thread describes very neatly the oddball mindset of typical sheeple who demand legislative action for the dumbest reasons possible :lol: (not pointing any fingers)
I'm always blown away by the sheer lack of utility trailer regulation. To me that seems like a HTA black hole. The government is leaving serious money on the table not to mention lives potentially lost. You never see a hearse pulling a trailer.
so do we impound bicycles if someone pulls a wheelie?
Because silly questions are not always worth answering
The questions that should be asked is why should a bicycle have to follow the exact same rules as a 6000 lbs motorized vehicle? and why is such emphasis/effort on this notion? it could be more simply addressed by educational campaigns with emphasis on responsibility for ones person safety on a bicycle.
-D-
Banned
:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:
uhm you mean like texting and driving oh wait and soon texting and walking legislation...you mean like drinking and driving, or seat belts or motorcycle helmets or ...
-D-
Banned
yodude
Banned
hey, what about nixon china reagan gorby??
throw the book at all stunters!! or anyone that messes with the public!!
or vote hillary..
then again, the green option is makin' noise.. with ajamu baraka as running mate
heh, but we already have PET jr, so there we go
Last edited:
Because any of the above has any relevance to the question I addressed
(or a dent in poor D's door for that matter) ... Whatever message you're trying to push losses any sway when you change the line of discourse from one post to the next simply for the sake of winning the argument. Moreover, when the reaction to a logical solution regarding 'how somebody could know the rules of the road without testing' is an irrelevant, sarcastic remark, you look the fool, as does your position. Like I said, silly questions are not always worth answering, and you just reminded me why I feel that way.
-D-
Banned
Because any of the above has any relevance to the question I addressed
Whatever message you're trying to push losses any sway when you change the line of discourse from one post to the next simply for the sake of winning the argument. Moreover, when the reaction to a logical solution regarding 'how somebody could know the rules of the road without testing' is an irrelevant, sarcastic remark, you look the fool, as does your position. Like I said, silly questions are not always worth answering, and you just reminded me why I feel that way.
Dude you make no sense...keep up...I as addressing other posters.
I asked a legitimate question based on the laws that govern us.
How do you hod someone accountable when you promoted and allowed them to do something with ignorance?
As for my dented door, thanks for agreeing to pay my deductible or fixing it...I will hang on to your uome.
My rules are simple, I damage your property then I pay for it, you damage mine then you do the same and pay for it.
And we wonder why we say look at all the self entitled ppl running around...hmm
-D-
Banned
oh, add this to your educational campaigns that are so effective...:sign7::sign7::sign7:
We ended up with speed limits...and who does not go over 100 km/h on the 401.
Also since some of you want to call other sheeps...I take it you need to be the wolf and flex your howl...I hope you don't obey speed limits...don't want to be a sheeple right...no seatbelt, text and drive, drink and drive...because it's all about you...so you show them.:blob8::blob8:
Paranoia and intelligent thought tend to be mutually exclusive.
I noticed you also avoided the article posted and the real life examples posted earlier by Flywheel.:lmao:
We ended up with speed limits...and who does not go over 100 km/h on the 401.
Also since some of you want to call other sheeps...I take it you need to be the wolf and flex your howl...I hope you don't obey speed limits...don't want to be a sheeple right...no seatbelt, text and drive, drink and drive...because it's all about you...so you show them.:blob8::blob8:
Paranoia and intelligent thought tend to be mutually exclusive.
I noticed you also avoided the article posted and the real life examples posted earlier by Flywheel.:lmao:
