That article, although probably containing tidbits of validity, appears to be loaded with the usual anti-EV clickbait and propaganda, though.
The claim that Uber drivers "their batteries are dying quickly" is counter to other published data on EV battery longevity (as long as one excludes the Nissan Leaf, which as everyone should know by now, lacks proper thermal management).
The claim that it's using Panasonic pouch batteries is inaccurate. It's using a multiple of the cylindrical-cell battery packs that Tesla is using in their cars. Granted, that could be either 2170 or 4680 cells, but it hardly matters. Tesla can build Model 3 and Y with either.
Yes, electrical distribution infrastructure needs to be upgraded in order to facilitate mass-market adoption. Everyone knows that ... and we've got 20ish years to do it.
The suspension comment may concern the front suspension (which carries less of the load), but the rear certainly uses axles. I highly doubt the front suspension uses car parts, and if it does, Tesla deserves what's going to happen to them. I see no reason for the front suspension being a double-wishbone design to be an issue. Regular transport trucks use leaf springs and beam axles because cheap, not because good. If they needed to use independent front suspension for packaging reasons, and they did it right (and with Tesla, this is an open question), that alone is not a concern.
Agree on center seating being stupid.
To be fair, 400 miles would seem pretty decent if Tesla hadn't promised 500 miles to begin with (even though, apparently, it will do 500 miles in ideal conditions).
EV trucks from other manufacturers (with more reasonable expectations!) are on the market in Europe already. Electric trucks - a complete solution
The claim that Uber drivers "their batteries are dying quickly" is counter to other published data on EV battery longevity (as long as one excludes the Nissan Leaf, which as everyone should know by now, lacks proper thermal management).
The claim that it's using Panasonic pouch batteries is inaccurate. It's using a multiple of the cylindrical-cell battery packs that Tesla is using in their cars. Granted, that could be either 2170 or 4680 cells, but it hardly matters. Tesla can build Model 3 and Y with either.
Yes, electrical distribution infrastructure needs to be upgraded in order to facilitate mass-market adoption. Everyone knows that ... and we've got 20ish years to do it.
The suspension comment may concern the front suspension (which carries less of the load), but the rear certainly uses axles. I highly doubt the front suspension uses car parts, and if it does, Tesla deserves what's going to happen to them. I see no reason for the front suspension being a double-wishbone design to be an issue. Regular transport trucks use leaf springs and beam axles because cheap, not because good. If they needed to use independent front suspension for packaging reasons, and they did it right (and with Tesla, this is an open question), that alone is not a concern.
Agree on center seating being stupid.
To be fair, 400 miles would seem pretty decent if Tesla hadn't promised 500 miles to begin with (even though, apparently, it will do 500 miles in ideal conditions).
EV trucks from other manufacturers (with more reasonable expectations!) are on the market in Europe already. Electric trucks - a complete solution