Shaman
Well-known member
I'm curious to understand just HOW different a litre bike can be? Can anyone put it into words? I refuse to believe that it's going to be as big of a jump as moving from a 250 to a 600... or is it?
Yes and no. Think of the power that a 600 makes at around 12,000 RPM. That's the kind of acceleration a 1000 has available at moderate engine speeds. Or thought of another way, a 1000 has similar acceleration in 5th as a 600 has in 2nd. Thought of yet another way, if you were to nail the throttle on both bikes, in those gears, at say 5,000 RPM, the 1000 will walk away. Helpful? I dunno.
In daily riding, the 1000 in some ways is both much better and much worse... you don't use the gears or the revs much unless you're willing to break the law flagrantly. But the ability to ride it sedately without getting frustrated by shifting from fifth to second gear just to pass a car as you might on the 600 makes them better road bikes for a lot of us. On the other hand, when you wring the guts out of a 1000 on the race track, you might find that the power is absolutely for the experienced, and the brave, and none other. Which is part of why I laugh at people who ask me "why didn't you buy a HP4 instead of your RSV4?" as they have no idea what a litre bike with 180hp is really capable of except for pointing it in a straight line and monkey-fisting the throttle. I had a *faster* bike than the S1000RR and sold it, as there was little point on the street.
Anyway, I'll get off the soapbox.
Last edited: