Yep you're right, why bother training at all.
First you can't answer a simple question but rather dance around it to avoid admitting you know **** all about it. Then you tell some BS story about your close "SEAL" friend who you claim says seals aren't able to hit their targets in combat (LOL) and now you are playing the guilt card because I should have known your made up friend had PTSD?
What's next? I should shut up because you are an MMA champion?
LOL
STFU
You're just another internet BS'er
Never said that...but I'll admit...if you ever get attacked by a static paper person I'll agree you're perfectly prepared.
So training is effectively pointless right?
Are all Olympic shooters seasoned combat veterans? We're talking different things here....going to a range and shooting targets means you're training for shooting targets. If you add combat training to that then yes...you're training for combat.
So training is effectively pointless right?
Are all Olympic shooters seasoned combat veterans? We're talking different things here....going to a range and shooting targets means you're training for shooting targets. If you add combat training to that then yes...you're training for combat.
Youre ignorant. You dont know anything about shooting, training, or what it takes to be proficient with a handgun.
Come back when you've done some pistol training and we can revisit this discussion.
And now at a shopping mall in New Jersey.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/jersey-shopping-plaza-shootout-leaves-dead/story?id=17124439#.UECnVpYuYgx
Yes your point was that you deem range training useless because paper targets will never attack you.