Then why bring it up in discussion over which one is better? What does the marketing strategy have to do with it??
i repeat, again, marketing is what apple products benefit from (and a idiot-proof os). incorporated into this is a pretty design/form factor. for some, aesthetics and the apple culture are valued. since so many of you have argued about the value of 'perception', then it definitely matters.
Another nonsensical argument that backs up exactly what I was saying. The domestic manufacturers have realized their mistakes and made massive changes. Ford/Buick/Cadillac all have extremely high customer satisfaction records. Check the sales of Hyundai and Ford this year. They listened to the customer, they listened when the customer said your products are trash and voted with their wallets.
the point was that the perception of japanese car/apple reliability and superiority does not match reality, a reality that includes domestic/non-apple manufacturers that are equal to, or better in terms of reliability. apparently i need to use simpler sentences to be understood. . .
Nobody cares what you would do, anecdotal evidence is pointless and useless. This is also false, because even if it was true it wouldn't explain the strong brand loyalty Apple users have. If they are so unhappy with their MBP that they paid sooo much for...why would they go out and buy another one
http://www.electronista.com/articles/10/03/10/apple.canon.samsung.lead.loyalty.index/
This ludicrous line of blaming the consumer for either being to fashion conscious, to uneducated tech wise, now we are on to blinded by the "price" they paid, this is what this discussion has been reduced to "the consumer is wrong"...lol. Its never the fact that Apple makes fantastic products that put the customers experience and satisfaction first.
if you bother reading the line below the one you bolded for emphasis, you'd see why brand loyalty is so high. simple os, that anyone can use. been writing this for days now. as for "anecdotal", i don't think you know what that word means. the correct word is "hypothetical", as i was suggesting a possible scenario, not based on personal experience.
reading fail. i was responding to a direct quote that claimed that "Apple kicks *** in the consumer market. People WANT their products". . .apple does not kick @ss in the computer market. it is getting better, but just cracked 10% market share. hardly kicking @ss.
lol, citing product loyalty or product satisfaction sources does NOTHING to prove i'm wrong. it shows a completely different, unrelated point, lol, so well done for that. unless of course, you thought that quote said "
some people want their products", in which case, i agree--current apple owners want apple products, which is basically what your sources demonstrate.