Whitby Accident Victim Identified

[FullMotoJacket]

Forum Sponsor

That's one. Big difference between one and several (and your disingenuous use of it to try and convey fleeing from police has reached pandemic proportions). Again, your sensationalistic yet not so truthful statement is false.

Keep jumping.

 

[GSXMAER]

.
.
.
.
.

 

[turbodish]

That's one. Big difference between one and several (and your disingenuous use of it to try and convey fleeing from police has reached pandemic proportions). Again, your sensationalistic yet not so truthful statement is false.

Keep jumping.

Who's being disingenuous? Your initial claim was one passenger and no riders.

This rider and the Whitby passenger makes two dead from riders fleeing police just in the Durham Region area. There are more if you want to look across the province, but I'll leave it up to you to look them up. Somehow I doubt that you're so inclined. You seem to prefer stalking me with personal attacks. That's pretty pathetic.

 

[FullMotoJacket]

Again with the semantics. Your original post said several riders have lost their lives running from police. Once caught in your lie, you've backpedaled and now it's riders or passengers, or weren't being chased yet, or had been previously chased. What's next? Was in a chase last year, and died in a crash this year counts as one? Just admit it. You either made it up or lied for dramatic effect. Everyone for the most part is smart enough to realize this is how you operate. I really don't know why you even bother..........unless this is the only motorsport enthusiast site in Ontario you haven't been banned from, and it's the only place you have left to spew your made up rhetoric.

 

[jc100]

Again with the semantics. Your original post said several riders have lost their lives running from police. Once caught in your lie, you've backpedaled and now it's riders or passengers, or weren't being chased yet, or had been previously chased. What's next? Was in a chase last year, and died in a crash this year counts as one? Just admit it. You either made it up or lied for dramatic effect. Everyone for the most part is smart enough to realize this is how you operate. I really don't know why you even bother..........unless this is the only motorsport enthusiast site in Ontario you're not banned from, and it's the only place you have left to spew your made up rhetoric.

I think you've got the wrong end of the stick...his examples are of people dying as a direct result of fleeing from or avoiding being stopped by the police while riding on a motorcycle. What's wrong with that?

 

[buttahz]

ENEWAYS! this guy hasnt been caught yet?

 

[FullMotoJacket]

I think you've got the wrong end of the stick...his examples are of people dying as a direct result of fleeing from or avoiding being stopped by the police while riding on a motorcycle. What's wrong with that?

"Almost guaranteed" outcome is not a guaranteed outcome. A number of riders died this year when their "guarantees" failed to hold.

Looks like plain English to me.

 

[turbodish]

Again with the semantics. Your original post said several riders have lost their lives running from police. Once caught in your lie, you've backpedaled and now it's riders or passengers, or weren't being chased yet, or had been previously chased.

If you want to play semantics, a passenger on a motorcycle is also consider to be riding that motorcycle. Or don't passengers count in your books? And if a rider should killed a car occupant or pedestrian, will they also not count in your books?

What's next? Was in a chase last year, and died in a crash this year counts as one?

Now you're being even more ridiculous. I think most adults here understand the context and immediate time frames involved. Why don't you?

You either made it up or lied for dramatic effect.

Hardly.

Everyone for the most part is smart enough to realize this is how you operate. I really don't know why you even bother..........unless this is the only motorsport enthusiast site in Ontario you haven't been banned from, and it's the only place you have left to spew your made up rhetoric.

Nothing is made up. I'm flattered that you seem to be so obsessed with me. Now, can you stick to actual topics at hand, or is your modus operandi to continue to mindlessly sling mud at those you disagree with?

 

[FullMotoJacket]

If you want to play semantics, a passenger on a motorcycle is also consider to be riding that motorcycle.

A passenger on a motorcycle is also riding the motorcycle? Where do you come up with this stuff?

Keep backpedalling. It's amusing.

 

[FullMotoJacket]

PSA: If you're going to run in Dallas, TX, DO NOT STOP AND SURRENDER.

www.dallasnews.com/video/index.html?bcid=609940441001

This was last week, BTW.

 

[jc100]

A passenger on a motorcycle is also riding the motorcycle? Where do you come up with this stuff?

Keep backpedalling. It's amusing.

Amusing is not understanding english....if there are two people on a horse is only one of them riding the horse?

 

[FullMotoJacket]

Amusing is not understanding english....if there are two people on a horse is only one of them riding the horse?

So you and your wife are in a car. You are behind the wheel, your wife is in the back seat. Is she driving the car?

 

[ddusseld]

There are no guarantees in life, period.... As I said, some runners get caught, some die and the rest get away. The get away number is orders of magnitude higher then the caught and/or die number. Back before 172 I had a number of interesting road side chats with the police and there was one common thread... they could not believe I pulled over. One time I pulled over into a parking lot in a store and had time to grab a drink before the officer "caught" me. But as I always said, why run when it was just a speeding ticket? Then came 172, gotta love it. I now have a clean driving record and low insurance...

Btw, for somebody who seems to advocate taking responsibility for their actions I'm surprised that you would indicate that somebody who posts about running is somehow responsible for another's running. Almost as silly as saying the police are somehow responsible for a runner because they chase...

"Almost guaranteed" outcome is not a guaranteed outcome. A number of riders died this year when their "guarantees" failed to hold. Others now have criminal conviction records and penalties. Either is far worse than a simple HTA conviction. Is it really worth rolling the dice when your life may be forfeit on a bad roll?

Anyone here promoting the idea that running is preferable to stopping is in part responsible for any bad outcome that results when another takes that advice.

 

[jc100]

So you and your wife are in a car. You are behind the wheel, your wife is in the back seat. Is she driving the car?

Nope...but two people are riding the horse...the tandem..and the bike....but only one is steering. You mentioned about semantics.....here you go.

 

[FullMotoJacket]

Typical BS deflecting by you two. You play the misinterpreted card when you either don't articulate yourself effectively, or make broad, baseless claims as fact and get called out on the carpet for it, then retort by jumping all over quirks and inflection in the English language as if it's some sort of victory. It's pretty sad when that's all you two self professed educated men can come up with in defense of yourselves when you get caught making up "facts".

Part 2: When you're late getting to your mother in law's house, and the wife's defense to her mother's protestations about her marrying someone with a spine instead is to say "we ran into traffic driving on the 401", who was driving? You? Her? Both of you?

 

[jc100]

Typical BS deflecting by you two. You play the misinterpreted card when you either don't articulate yourself effectively, or make broad, baseless claims as fact and get called out on the carpet for it, then retort by jumping all over quirks and inflection in the English language as if it's some sort of victory. It's pretty sad when that's all you two self professed educated men can come up with in defense of yourselves when you get caught making up "facts".

Part 2: When you're late getting to your mother in law's house, and the wife's defense to her mother's protestations about her marrying someone with a spine instead is to say "we ran into traffic driving on the 401", who was driving? You? Her? Both of you?

Read up a bit. You chewed someone out for apparently not giving correct details. I just pointed out that according to the english language the details were correct. Not my problem if you don't like rules..............................................................................................................of grammar.

 

[BusaBob]

Pretty much the same thing stopping him from pulling you over for no reason, shooting you for no reason, and then planting a knife or drop gun on you.

lol. so nothing

 

[DS2]

lol. so nothing

This is exatly my concern with the lack of due process with respect to HTA172, we are at the whims of whatever mood the cop might be in at the time.

I mean who knows, maybe he just caught his wife getting nailed by a "ninjaboy" and is looking for a little retribution...

 

[djltoronto]

Sat Sep 18 13:44:05 EDT 2010
Police make arrest after woman falls from motorcycle, dies

Police have made an arrest three weeks after a woman fell off the back of a motorcycle and was run over on Highway 401 in Whitby. The motorcycle's driver did not stop.

North York's Rashid Soujah, 37, has been charged with manslaughter.

For more information, read the story on CP24.com or tune in to CP24.

 

[de Jager]

It's about time.

Forum Sponsor