Dresden
Well-known member
Read below...
I see where both you and DDean are coming from, however both of you fail to show any evidence to the "exploitation of the customer" claim.
If the dealership coerced OP into putting a deposit down and offering him an option to cancel and get his money back at any point, then I would whole heartedly agree with you both. This does not seem to be the case. As far as you and me know, there were no deposit-refund options given to the OP, implied or otherwise; bear in mind we have only heard OP's side of the story.
What we have here instead is exploitation of social media/this forum to cast a negative image of the dealership in order to get away with bypassing a legally binding arrangement; I.e. The OP is using means necessary (negative attention) to force the dealership to settle with him, even thought the dealership has no legal obligation to do so.
In a simpler analogy - If I was selling my bike and someone gave me a deposit at a pre-arranged price.. that person must be dreaming if they think I will refund them the money if they flake. That was the intent of the deposit. It does not matter if I can sell the bike again with relatively no additional effort. The point is, you agreed to the price and put down a deposit. See it through. The dealer does no owe him anything and is doing him a small favour by letting him out of the contract at all! Try doing this on a B2B basis. You would have been sued before you could finish your first sentence. :lmao: