The Bad Drivers of Ontario Thread | Page 278 | GTAMotorcycle.com

The Bad Drivers of Ontario Thread

My wife was making a right onto our street and the person behind her was honking because she wasn't going through fast enough. Was my wife supposed to run over the person walking their dog through the intersection?

It will get interesting if the pro bike advocates get Bloor Street made two traffic lanes. Adding two bike lanes leaves two traffic lanes and a left turn lane. There is no right turn lane so when the horde of students from the numerous local schools get out or arrive at intersections the right turning drivers have to wait. The buses behind them have to wait. The cars behind the buses have to wait. The ambulances, police cars or fire trucks behind the cars can use the left turn lane but it could already be grid locked with left turners and no way of cars backing out. With the buses being stalled in traffic they will fall behind schedule and take longer to load when they finally get to a bus stop. Following cars if not properly trained and patient may cause cross street gridlock.

Will the bicyclists passing the buses on the right stop behind the rearmost open door? Will they get into a snit if buses use their precious bike lane to off and on load passengers?

Will the 500 pounds (227 KG) e-bikers passing the buses on the right stop behind the rearmost open door or blow through at 24+ KPH. They have no mandated training or legal knowledge requirements or insurance or identification.

Fortunately everyone will be so happy with societal progress that they will smile and relax as the problem takes care of itself. (Puke)
I had many of the same thoughts when Toronto started setting up advanced walk signals in the downtown core. That dead time between light changes was one of the few times that cars could make right turns, before they were blocked by pedestrians in the crossings. That's assuming the pedestrians waited, of course, which they generally don't do. I have found that when I'm crossing on those advanced signals they tee me up, pretty much perfectly, for a right turning car on the cross street to take me out, as I get to the other side.
 
Another DUI with 2 dead on the QEW. 30 something YO charged. Looks like there was a vehicle fire. 😥
Two counts of DUI and two counts of dangerous. Another vehicle piling into the back of stopped traffic in a construction zone.

 
Quoting "While the breath test police took showed dump truck driver Sukhvinder Rai registered nearly three times the legal limit of alcohol in his blood, that evidence was ruled inadmissible because it was obtained too long after the crash."

So he was 3X the limit and the test was taken late? What was it when the event happened? Don't BA levels go down with time?
 
No charges laid. Another police fail. A range rover tried to use the extra special dbag only lane and didn't fit.


16102023mc400carwedged1.jpg;w=960
 
Quoting "While the breath test police took showed dump truck driver Sukhvinder Rai registered nearly three times the legal limit of alcohol in his blood, that evidence was ruled inadmissible because it was obtained too long after the crash."

So he was 3X the limit and the test was taken late? What was it when the event happened? Don't BA levels go down with time?
There is a time limit for how long after the initial interaction/road side test until they administer the actual BA test. If they exceeded the time limit, they broke process/law/precedent/whatever, logic does not apply to the legal system just the rules.

It has nothing to do with the law but BA increases as your body processes/metabolizes the booze, then it goes down. Back in the day one of my classmates was pulled over leaving the pub. He had just pounded back three pints after class (chugged), he was pulled over right away and passed roadside (but likely stunk of beer). They knew he was drinking, they took him in and kept administering the BA until he failed. He won in court (but lost in the wallet, costs caused him to drop out) as he was something like 15 minutes from home and it took 45 minutes until he was over 0.08. He was never impaired behind the wheel and would have been home before we was.... that was in the early 90s for what it is worth. The above mentioned rule also did not apply to him as he was under the time limit. I doubt this was the case for the truck driver and his BA was going down.
 
Whoops. Crashed his helicopter into his house. Insurance will love that. Minor injuries and house doesn't look too bad (although he put a big rip in his "lawn").

Sod, shingles and spruce vs helicopter rotor blades. The home insurer will get off with the lighter tab.
 
There is a time limit for how long after the initial interaction/road side test until they administer the actual BA test. If they exceeded the time limit, they broke process/law/precedent/whatever, logic does not apply to the legal system just the rules.

It has nothing to do with the law but BA increases as your body processes/metabolizes the booze, then it goes down. Back in the day one of my classmates was pulled over leaving the pub. He had just pounded back three pints after class (chugged), he was pulled over right away and passed roadside (but likely stunk of beer). They knew he was drinking, they took him in and kept administering the BA until he failed. He won in court (but lost in the wallet, costs caused him to drop out) as he was something like 15 minutes from home and it took 45 minutes until he was over 0.08. He was never impaired behind the wheel and would have been home before we was.... that was in the early 90s for what it is worth. The above mentioned rule also did not apply to him as he was under the time limit. I doubt this was the case for the truck driver and his BA was going down.
I forgot to take the delay / peak factor into account.

I had an alcoholic friend and tried to keep him occasionally sober by taking him out anywhere as long as he was clean. We had an incident when he became drunk in the car, had to pee and when I stopped to let him out he fell in such a way it looked like I hit him.

He had obviously tanked up just before I got to his place. I changed the system to having a 30 minute visit before we left. All too often he was passed out before the half hour was up.

Too bad. He was a not a bad guy other than his addiction to Camel cigarettes and rye. His inheritance would have made him a double digit millionaire today but the smokes killed him, dying in subsidized housing. His dad changed his will so his efforts would go where appreciated.
 
Whoops. Crashed his helicopter into his house. Insurance will love that. Minor injuries and house doesn't look too bad (although he put a big rip in his "lawn").

Looks like an EC-130 to me? The current best guess I have for a tail number is C-FWFJ but I'm not very confident in that. There was also an EC-120 flying in and out of his heliport recently with the tail number C-FLBA
 
Not gonna lie that’s a bit impressive…252 in a Mustang. Didn’t know they had that much in them.
It was a rental car so obviously stock. Slightly surprised the rental company didn't have some form of speed control (either a hard limit or a GPS that would call in major infractions so the company could call the renter and tell them to tone it down).

 
It was a rental car so obviously stock. Slightly surprised the rental company didn't have some form of speed control (either a hard limit or a GPS that would call in major infractions so the company could call the renter and tell them to tone it down).

Wow for the rental doing that, not that I approve. In the early days of NASCAR there was a female racer that rented or borrowed a dealership car to race. It was a problem when she rolled it.

I assume the driver is renting the car while it's impounded.
 
Wow for the rental doing that

152 MPH sounds about right for a GT Premium package. Darkhorse is probably electronically limited to 165. Maybe a bit more.
 
152 MPH sounds about right for a GT Premium package. Darkhorse is probably electronically limited to 165. Maybe a bit more.
I would have thought the rental agency would put on some limiter for liability reasons.

When I was about 20 YO a car dealership was forced to give me a replacement vehicle for a day or two because they made as service screw up. The only thing they had was a peppy looking convertible that took a while for them to have checked out for me. They obviously tweaked it into being a dog.

I pulled up next to two old biddies in an Austin Westminster at a light expecting to leave them in the dust. They beat me and weren't even trying.
 

Back
Top Bottom