Terrorist attack in the factory in Saint-Quentin-Fallavier

better yet go to brampton(brown)/ markham(asian) ask all the old people you find..

do they know any one divorced in their age group?
do they know if any one in their family was divorced in their elders... you are gonna ge ta big fat no.. and a how dare you say that look

right now those are the only accurate stats you can possibly get... unless you are willing to go convince the govts its a good idea to convert all the records on DEAD people into digital format and post it online.

PS; indian politicians are gonna have a new joke.
" and the dude from canada asked us to " convert all the records on DEAD people into digital format and post it online." laughs all around.
 
Last edited:
its called common knowledge...

Ohhhhh ... cause the only data you did provide actualy does support your claims with the exception of immediately after the war after that it dropped.


  • 1945 - 35%
  • 1946 - 43%
  • 1947 - 34%
  • 1948 - 28%
  • 1949 - 27%
  • 950 - 26%
  • 1951 - 1953 - 25%
  • 1954 - 24%
  • 1953 - 25%
  • 1954 - 24%
  • 1955 - 1956 - 23%
  • 1957 - 22%
  • 1958 - 21%
  • 1959 - 1963 - 22%
  • 1964 - 24%
  • 1965 - 1966 - 25%
  • 1967 - 26%

Until the 70's when no fault divorce came into effect and made it more accessible.
 
Sounds totally statically sound
or yo go to asia proper and spend the rest of your life asking people that question.. good luck

kinda gone off topic.. reach awyala.. you will beg him to stop dumping verifiable info on you.. dude like save every info he encounters.
 
Last edited:
or yo go to asia proper and spend the rest of your life asking people that question.. good luck

This is some grade a Gole post moving here putting the emphasis on me to get data to backup your "common knowledge" that the only stats you did prove show the oposite of your claims
 
This is some grade a Gole post moving here butting the emphasis on me to get data to backup your "common knowledge" that the only stats you did prove show the oposite of your claims


they did have a whole lot of dead husbands right after WW2 hard to divorce a dead guy... as the shock of the war goes away.. and both adults in a family start to work the trend start again..my claim was divorce rates skyrocketed due to the industrial revolution.. and the stats i have posted prove that.. in the east especially after WW2 unfortunately we simply don't have such data online for pre WW2 you can ge post WW2 data and still see a clear spike.. but since no pre WW2 data comparison is impossible.
 
adults in a family start to work the trend start again..my claim was divorce rates skyrocketed due to the industrial revolution.. and the stats i have posted prove that..

NO the Indy Revolution is from 1760 to 1840. Stats you provided start after by 20 years and while they show an increase its gradual
 
Last edited:
NO the Indy Revolution as from 1760 to 1840. Stats you provided start after by 20 years and while they show an increase its gradual
so 7% in 1900 to 43% in 1946 is a gradual increase? in 46 years from 1 in 11 couples getting divorced to 1 in 2 getting divorced a gradual change you are saying?

notice highest divorce rates right after husbands come home to find out wives are competition in and out of the house.
 
so 7% in 1900 to 43% in 1946 is a gradual increase? in 46 years from 1 in 11 couples getting divorced to 1 in 2 getting divorced a gradual change you are saying?

Plot it out on a graph its a gradual increase


  • 1867 - 1879 - 3%
  • 1880 - 1886 - 4%
  • 1887 - 1890 - 5%
  • 1891 - 1897 - 6%
  • 1898 - 1900 - 7%
  • 1901 - 1906 - 8%
  • 1907 - 1910 - 9%
  • 1914 - 1915 - 10%
  • 1916 - 1925 - Between 10% to 15%
  • 1925 - 1930 - 16%
  • 1930 - 16%
  • 1931 - 15%
  • 1932 - 13%
  • 1933 - 16%
  • 1934 - 17%
  • 1935 - 17%
  • 1936 - 18%
  • 1937 - 19%
  • 1938 - 19%
  • 1939 - 19%
  • 1940 - 20%
  • 1941 - 22%
  • 1942 - 24%
  • 1943 - 26%
  • 1944 - 29%
  • 1945 - 35%
  • 1946 - 43%
ALSO NOTE THIS IS THE END OF THE WAR - What happens after

  • 1947 - 34%
  • 1948 - 28%
  • 1949 - 27%

Im not arguing the increase but the cause here
 
widows get married.. it didn't go back to the status quo from the 19th century... WW! and WW@ raised divorce rates considerably which has been my point all along.. women started working and changing the core structures..... since men and women now started competing with each other as you have shown above rates only went down marginally after 1946 .. marginally compared to before the whole WW1&2 mess...

remember 1946 1 in 2 are divorced it can't reach 1 in 1.. statistically damn near impossible... next 10 years the divorced 50% find partners.. settle in.. but competition rises again with vietnaam.. wises taking lead role again.. some thing that never reversed after the vietnaam war...

since then divorce has been pretty darn common...
 
Last edited:
widows get married.. it didn't go back to the status quo from the 19th century... WW! and WW@ raised divorce rates considerably which has been my point all along.. women started working and changing the core structures..... since men and women now started competing with each other as you have shown above rates only went down marginally after 1946 .. marginally compared to before the whole WW1&2 mess...

No if anything the end of the depression due to increased wealth caused that. It even says that in your stats.
 
No if anything the end of the depression due to increased wealth caused that. It even says that in your stats.


depression came because of the end of the war.. no jobs and double the competition.. clash of personalities.. by the time the dust settled from the depression people realized they didn't wanna stay married to someone who " challenges them" but decreases stress levels.. less competition
 
Your so dishonest the drops in 1946 was 9% percent the biggest increase was 8% its the biggest change in the entire data set

you don't see the spike.. 1900 7 % mere 46 years 43%

full 100 years to get to 7% and only 46 to get to 43% is not a substantial hike in divorce rates?

politicians don't makes laws that are not demanded by the people.. no fault demand came in because their were so many divorces.. no fault divorce wasn't done randomly.. it was don't because divorces were taking up too much time of the courts and creating one heck of a legal mess.... politicians only find solutions after the public demands it.. not because they are feeling good on a particular day.
 
Last edited:
you don't see the spike.. 1900 7 % mere 46 years 43%

full 100 years to get to 7% and only 46 to get to 43% is not a substantial hike in divorce rates?

.

you need to look year to year -

Ya know what im done your being horribly disingenuous in this conversation
 
Back
Top Bottom