Minimum Wage Increase | Page 7 | GTAMotorcycle.com

Minimum Wage Increase

The average GTA wage isnt anywhere near $134K. Only about 1 in 10 people in the GTA make that. Median household income is around $85K

Where are you getting those sqft numbers from? Houses might have gotten bigger but apartments and condos mean people have much less space that ever before.
What size lots did the average 1971 house rest on?
Average may be 134. It gets distorted by quite a few people making orders of magnitude above median. Drake reportedly made 45M in 2020. He alone pulls up the average by $15. Obviously he is pretty high but there are lots higher and many many many in the 200 plus range.

I think his numbers are single family homes not dwellings. Lot sizes were bigger, dwellings were smaller. I think we should more accurately say land value has far outpaced income instead of house prices. That is probably the dominant factor but as land climbs, people convert starter houses into smaller "luxury" houses and starter houses disappear.
Sorry, I concur, lazy research on my part. Your listing for family income may have been better researched.
Sq ft is for single family home, not condo or apartment.
To throw another hoop in the ring, are we talking Toronto or Greater Toronto Area?
Chances are someone living in Cachet Markham or Burlington will to be making way more than someone renting in Regent Park.
 
I would guess there was a huge jump in the number of dual income renters in the past several years. Its only going to get worse going forward.
Many of them can afford the mortgage but cant afford the down-payment.

The majority of homeowners in Toronto would never have been able to buy if they were starting out today.
Almost every single person I know who got into the market since 2015 had help from their parents.
Forget Toronto at this point. Townhouses in Barrie are selling at 700 or more. 2,000/mo gets you about 400K mortgage. Almost nobody has a 300K downpayment to get in. Now you are trying to start in a condo but are being bled dry by condo fees and stupidity. Realistically, buying far away as an investment is probably the only way in for most in southern ontario (unless somebody gives you a giant cash infusion).
 
Sorry, I concur, lazy research on my part. Your listing for family income may have been better researched.
Sq ft is for single family home, not condo or apartment.
To throw another hoop in the ring, are we talking Toronto or Greater Toronto Area?
Chances are someone living in Cachet Markham or Burlington will to be making way more than someone renting in Regent Park.
My numbers were likely Toronto Toronto as the census didn't say GTA. I didn't dig into the details to confirm.
 
1970 - You were competing against other Canadians for jobs, housing etc.

2021 - You're competing against everyone in the world for Canadian jobs, housing, etc.

The Millennials and Gen-Z voted for it again. That's costing them their standard of living.
 
I'm not saying that, just bringing up unintended consequences. I dislike Universal income for lots of reasons but there may need to be some level of it implemented. Maybe something like supplementing people that are on low fixed incomes to index their income to minimum wage? At least then they stay the same poor instead of constantly being pushed backwards.
I have mixed opinions on this. I really dislike incentives that encourage people not to work, or work for cash while sucking at the public teat.

I understand there are people that need help because they are not equipped to do a days work for a days pay, and yes I think providing them support or a hand up is necessary.

Able-bodied people should not have the option or incentive to place themselves on the dole.
 
1970 - You were competing against other Canadians for jobs, housing etc.

2021 - You're competing against everyone in the world for Canadian jobs, housing, etc.

The Millennials and Gen-Z voted for it again. That's costing them their standard of living.
What I worry about with all this socialism is twofold.

1) we develop a culture that demands the gov't take over personal responsibility and slowly follow the path of Greece, Argentina, Italy... Rich get incredibly rich and poor get poorer.
- or -
2) The country polarizes and we make a hard right toward populism and divisiveness.
 
I have mixed opinions on this. I really dislike incentives that encourage people not to work, or work for cash while sucking at the public teat.

I understand there are people that need help because they are not equipped to do a days work for a days pay, and yes I think providing them support or a hand up is necessary.

Able-bodied people should not have the option or incentive to place themselves on the dole.
I agree with that.

I bring up ODSP as it pays crap but I think it is in dire need of a thorough overhaul. Kick out the 50%+ that should not be in the program, give the people that need the program money to survive and net cost is roughly zero.

A hard one for me is retired without sufficient savings (or a crap pension where they trusted the company/govt to take care of them and that trust was misplaced). You don't want public funds to put them ahead of people that did what was needed to take care of themselves for their entire life but is it reasonable to force them to work until they die if they want to have a place to live? I don't really like that approach either. Further to that problem, there needs to be a regulatory overhaul to put unfunded corporate pensions in secured creditor slot one. All banks can fight for two and back. Sure, that will mean some companies collapse earlier but most companies that tight on cash circle the drain for a while enriching the top while screwing the bottom.
 
Whether you are a proponent of Universal Basic Income or not, it may become an absolute necessity if AI and automation continues to advance at its current rate. In every industrial revolution, emergent technologies have always created more jobs than what was displaced. However with AI, almost every single job, from manual labour to knowledge worker - including "AI programmer" - will be made obsolete because a machine will be able to do it faster and better.

Opponents to UBI claim payments will disincentivize the workforce to find jobs. However, if there aren't any jobs anymore, there won't be any income either. Ultimately, this may lead to a Star-Trek-like post-scarcity currency-free society. There might be a rethinking about all the values we place on income, including self-worth and the pursuit of happiness, the meaning of life, value to society, accumulation of material possessions, etc.

Fascinating, Captain.
 
Whether you are a proponent of Universal Basic Income or not, it may become an absolute necessity if AI and automation continues to advance at its current rate. In every industrial revolution, emergent technologies have always created more jobs than what was displaced. However with AI, almost every single job, from manual labour to knowledge worker - including "AI programmer" - will be made obsolete because a machine will be able to do it faster and better.

Opponents to UBI claim payments will disincentivize the workforce to find jobs. However, if there aren't any jobs anymore, there won't be any income either. Ultimately, this may lead to a Star-Trek-like post-scarcity currency-free society. There might be a rethinking about all the values we place on income, including self-worth and the pursuit of happiness, the meaning of life, value to society, accumulation of material possessions, etc.

Fascinating, Captain.
Government cashflow in that scenario becomes very interesting. Politicians will still want to be able to dish out favours and money but where does the input come from? How do you appropriately tax a computer that optimizes airline schedules? What if the computer is in international waters? Straight consumption tax is probably insufficient to provide the money required to keep the unemployed masses fed. Is it constructive to have tens of millions of people living in the country if many have nothing to do? Convert to the China approach to limit population to a supportable level? Very interesting.
 
Whether you are a proponent of Universal Basic Income or not, it may become an absolute necessity if AI and automation continues to advance at its current rate. In every industrial revolution, emergent technologies have always created more jobs than what was displaced. However with AI, almost every single job, from manual labour to knowledge worker - including "AI programmer" - will be made obsolete because a machine will be able to do it faster and better.

Opponents to UBI claim payments will disincentivize the workforce to find jobs. However, if there aren't any jobs anymore, there won't be any income either. Ultimately, this may lead to a Star-Trek-like post-scarcity currency-free society. There might be a rethinking about all the values we place on income, including self-worth and the pursuit of happiness, the meaning of life, value to society, accumulation of material possessions, etc.

Fascinating, Captain.
That's stuff for philosophers to excogitate right now, were pretty far away from AI threatening employment IMHO.

Perhaps the distant future we will have AI barbers, pilots, and day care workers. Till then we have the present to work on, UBI (and all other forms of welfare) transfers personal responsibility away from individuals into the hands of govt.

I'd prefer my govt focus on providing a safety net, not a safety hammock.
 
I’m all for Universal Income. The guy making 30k/year gets the same as the guy making 150k/year.

Tax the total income at the respective tax rates and I’m all good. Make an arbitrary line (say 40k) and you remove all incentive for anyone between 40-52k (assume 1k/month).

The guy making 30k will use it for necessities and the guy making 150k will invest it or use it for thrills.
 
I'm not for universal income , ever. I'm not moving to Norway or Sweden where everyone is very happy , I like a system where I make what I make because of what I do.
Social systems and minimum wages that allow people to live, not drive a porche, but rent an apartment and have groceries and health care is completely needed IMO.
Paying Fred to be a crossing guard and make what a bank mortgage broker makes? Welcome to Cuba. I'm no socialist.
 
Forget Toronto at this point. Townhouses in Barrie are selling at 700 or more. 2,000/mo gets you about 400K mortgage. Almost nobody has a 300K downpayment to get in. Now you are trying to start in a condo but are being bled dry by condo fees and stupidity. Realistically, buying far away as an investment is probably the only way in for most in southern ontario (unless somebody gives you a giant cash infusion).
Which is why we live in Orangeville. We bought our first house in Brampton in 1982 because we couldn't afford a house in Toronto at the time, even with two incomes. Lived in Brampton for 10 years and still couldn't afford to move closer to Toronto, so bought a house in Orangeville. Both of our kids moved to Toronto for work, but could only afford apartments. In the last four years they have both moved back and bought houses in Orangeville. In the last few years housing prices have soared up here as well, so both of our kids made a good choice and have built some equity.
 
^^
I feel like I made a mistake working in Toronto >.<
A smart guy I know was setting up a tech company about 20 years ago. He chose to put it in peterborough. He could pay roughly toronto wages but housing was <25% of toronto prices so the employees could live like rockstars if they wanted (or save a bundle and get in the fire game before that was even a thing).
 
A smart guy I know was setting up a tech company about 20 years ago. He chose to put it in peterborough. He could pay roughly toronto wages but housing was <25% of toronto prices so the employees could live like rockstars if they wanted (or save a bundle and get in the fire game before that was even a thing).
I like that idea however outlying areas can be challenging for talent, particularly in tech. I managed a lot of tech in my younger years, the toughest time I had was in a beautiful community in So California, Santa Barbara. We had some great engineers, but tech companies need a healthy rate of positive attrition to manage the speed of change. We strived for an average developer tenure of 5 years, we had trouble keeping it under 10.

Having a developer force that settles down and codes till they retire isn't a winning formula in tech. You need a revolving door of folks like @油井緋色 to keep the machine running at redline.

 
I like that idea however outlying areas can be challenging for talent, particularly in tech. I managed a lot of tech in my younger years, the toughest time I had was in a beautiful community in So California, Santa Barbara. We had some great engineers, but tech companies need a healthy rate of positive attrition to manage the speed of change. We strived for an average developer tenure of 5 years, we had trouble keeping it under 10.

Having a developer force that settles down and codes till they retire isn't a winning formula in tech. You need a revolving door of folks like @油井緋色 to keep the machine running at redline.

He grew the company for 10 years, added offices in a few foreign countries (maybe to increase his developer pool?) and then sold it to OpenText. Not sure if the company maintained presence in Petey or relocated to Markham. He worked for opentext for the obligatory two years and then moved on.
 

Back
Top Bottom