what *should* be done is a constant review of our existing laws, not creating new ones constantly. Unfortunately reviewing old laws is not sexy, and cannot be as politicized.
I think most of these new laws are the product of progress. There are things around today that were not around 10 years ago, and since laws are so specific, new laws must be drawn up to cover the new "inventions". Not saying they all due to that, but a good percentage are. Imagine the number of HTA changes that have occured since 1900.
Not his first time.
This guy has issues with people doing their job it seems...
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2011/01/21/bc-mountie-accused-again.html
This is why all complaints against all public servants should be accessible by the public. IMO, the only way the little guy who was wronged may eventually see redress against these bureaucratic fortresses is if complaints are taken seriously, logged, publicized and archived so that patterns of violence or general misconduct MUST BE identified and dealt with.
I think most of these new laws are the product of progress. There are things around today that were not around 10 years ago, and since laws are so specific, new laws must be drawn up to cover the new "inventions". Not saying they all due to that, but a good percentage are. Imagine the number of HTA changes that have occured since 1900.
If the guy was smart he would have gone out the back door, circled around behind them in the dark, surprised them, hearded them into his garage at gunpoint, and called the cops. That way, when the cops showed up 4 hours later, he would have only been up on unlawful confinement charges.
Are doctors public servants? 'cause if you wanna talk "bureaucratic fortress" the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons is a real plum.
You would be looking at:
Confiscation of the device.
Confiscation of the plate, which is the property of the Ministry of Transport.
Subsequent towing of the vehicle, which is no longer legal to operate on a highway.
... and a charge under HTA section 13 or section 191, for using a device that obstructs your plate.
In other words, don't do it. Use the 401, 403, etc.. Using the 407, but not paying for it, is theft.
Those bums won't serve a day in jail and they'll wait for him where he doesn't have his guns.
i.e. his house ... "His collection of seven guns, five pistols and two rifles was seized"
This one's pretty straightforward.
IF the cops identified themselves and asked the suspect to stop, and
IF the suspect refused to comply.
...then the cop was justified in tackling him. Hell, it's better than shooting or tazering him. The fact that the guy landed on his head is not pertinent to the issue unless you believe the cop put him in a coma on purpose, which is a silly proposition. So there should be plenty of 3rd party witnesses to tell exactly what happened, to ensure that justice is served in this case.
This one's pretty straightforward.
IF the cops identified themselves and asked the suspect to stop, and
IF the suspect refused to comply.
...then the cop was justified in tackling him. Hell, it's better than shooting or tazering him. The fact that the guy landed on his head is not pertinent to the issue unless you believe the cop put him in a coma on purpose, which is a silly proposition. So there should be plenty of 3rd party witnesses to tell exactly what happened, to ensure that justice is served in this case.
Even when he gets'em back... He can only have'em at home or at the range.. It's not like he'll get a permit to carry a gun for his protection even though his life would be in danger. His neighbor can always hire other people to firebomb his house and those guys will be walking around way before he gets his guns back.
NO. not that i know of.has turbodish and lucky2 ever met face to face?