Re: Police State Canada 2010 and the G20 Summit
The answer to the particular question is no. It doesn't mention anything about the act being heroic. It asks if he was a hero. You do however get bonus points for circumventing.
Now, back to the point of the rhetorical question. While the "better safe than sorry" response to the standoff was warrented, in reality the man was unarmed. The situation could have been handled by two cops. One to hold him at gunpoint, the other to kick him in the head then cuff him. There was nothing heroic about the outcome of the situation whatsoever.
not sure. the act sure is bloody heroic, though.
even in war, how many would make that split second decision to sacrifice themselves?
The answer to the particular question is no. It doesn't mention anything about the act being heroic. It asks if he was a hero. You do however get bonus points for circumventing.
Now, back to the point of the rhetorical question. While the "better safe than sorry" response to the standoff was warrented, in reality the man was unarmed. The situation could have been handled by two cops. One to hold him at gunpoint, the other to kick him in the head then cuff him. There was nothing heroic about the outcome of the situation whatsoever.
Last edited: