Law Enforcement - The Good, The Bad, The Ugly..... | Page 279 | GTAMotorcycle.com

Law Enforcement - The Good, The Bad, The Ugly.....

Who was in the wrong?

  • Cop

    Votes: 23 20.7%
  • Dude who got shot

    Votes: 33 29.7%
  • I like turtles

    Votes: 55 49.5%

  • Total voters
    111
The suspect is named Kent Bell.. if anyone wants to look up the incident.
3 cops were shot during that incident... Bell shot one of them.. the other two were shot by cops.
The cop that shot through his own wind shield.. had one of the bullets come back and hit himself in the vest.
I’m just shocked that after so much firing only 2 bullets struck the suspect.

The rest were other officers and bystanders shot by the cops.

Idiots with guns.
 
Idiots with guns are right. For the amount of money that goes into the police force, they get a laughable amount of hands-on firearms training and practice. I know some jurisdictions very few will ever touch theirs but for the big cities you'd think they would have a better training, testing and refresher program.
 
Painful to watch, mind blowing the suspect was only shot twice and survived that. So much crossfire going on, everyone wanted to join in.
 
When it comes to the shooting and claim of self defence.

It doesn't matter why they were home invading the guy's house.
It doesn't matter how his gun was stored.. and wouldn't even matter if he was a legal gun owner and/or the gun was legal.

Neither will be considered when it comes to the murder charge and the claim of self defence.
I've been waffling about this. On one side there's the concept of letting someone assault you when you could have taken defensive life threatening action and the other side, taking or altering a life.

I like the self defense concept but don't want to go Yankee.

By laying murder charges it means a five figure legal cost. There is no free kill.

It makes the defender think before he pulls the trigger, hopefully long before the event occurs.
 
I've been waffling about this. On one side there's the concept of letting someone assault you when you could have taken defensive life threatening action and the other side, taking or altering a life.

I like the self defense concept but don't want to go Yankee.

By laying murder charges it means a five figure legal cost. There is no free kill.

It makes the defender think before he pulls the trigger, hopefully long before the event occurs.
I don't think that would make any difference no one thinks of the cost or the sentence before doing something in the heat of the moment.

Sent from the future
 
I don't think that would make any difference no one thinks of the cost or the sentence before doing something in the heat of the moment.

Sent from the future
In fact if someone actually thinks about it, before performing the act, then it's no longer "in the heat of the moment" but rather premeditated.
 
The suspect is named Kent Bell.. if anyone wants to look up the incident.
3 cops were shot during that incident... Bell shot one of them.. the other two were shot by cops.
The cop that shot through his own wind shield.. had one of the bullets come back and hit himself in the vest.
Reminds me of this little gem, but the Buffalo situation was even worse. The officer in Las Vegas received a national commendation, if you can believe it.

 
I don't think that would make any difference no one thinks of the cost or the sentence before doing something in the heat of the moment.

Sent from the future
Say a $50,000 legal cost, shoot, pay it and live. Don't shoot and the $50K becomes part of your estate. If the perp is likely to kill a loved one, is your wife or kid worth $50 K alive?

Pay the lawyer or the undertaker.
 
I've been waffling about this. On one side there's the concept of letting someone assault you when you could have taken defensive life threatening action and the other side, taking or altering a life.

I like the self defense concept but don't want to go Yankee.

By laying murder charges it means a five figure legal cost. There is no free kill.

It makes the defender think before he pulls the trigger, hopefully long before the event occurs.

I strongly agree with not wanting to become more like the US.
I am good with them laying the charges... by doing so, you ensure there are lots of eyes and legal knowledge looking at the incident... and I think that's a good idea.
If the incident is a good case of self defense.. the victim won't have any trouble raising funds from the public.
 
This is why we need bodycam footage.
I don't understand why he told them he was gay though.... what does that have to do with anything. So strange.

I will say, if a whole bunch of cops come jumping out of cars pointing guns at me, I am getting my ass on the ground with my hands on my head. We can sort s**t out later.
This is the best course of action, however, you should not be made to give up your Charter Rights in order to placate a police officer.
 
This is the best course of action, however, you should not be made to give up your Charter Rights in order to placate a police officer.
I'm not sure about Canada but US videos show police using hostile detaining even when the subject is peaceful and compliant. I know it's a tough call and there is armchair quarterbacking going on but just as construction workers accept some risks, so must police. Dead is dead, bullet or fall.
 
I'm not sure about Canada but US videos show police using hostile detaining even when the subject is peaceful and compliant. I know it's a tough call and there is armchair quarterbacking going on but just as construction workers accept some risks, so must police. Dead is dead, bullet or fall.
Quality of policing, in the US, tends to have a much broader range than it does in Canada. We have Provincial, as well as Federal standards. In the US it can go city by city. Cross the line from city to county, and suddenly you might find yourself spread across the hood of your car. Also, in the US, courts have determined that police have no real duty to follow the most common motto on the doors of their patrol cars, "To Protect and Serve."

 

‘The optics are terrible’: Toronto police criticized over senior officer’s role as head of internal discipline​


good grief!
 

‘The optics are terrible’: Toronto police criticized over senior officer’s role as head of internal discipline​


good grief!

I'd like to know the details of those shootings before casting judgement. If they were genuinely necessary then he's probably in a good position to judge others and what they do in high stress situations.
 
The good, the bad, the ugly...and the incompetent...


Absolutely ridiculous that a missing signature lets a driver get off without a charge in killing a young man. Sickening.
And yet unless you hired an ex cop to be your advocate in PON court the JP would likely ask the crown for the pertain info and amend it there in frount of you and find you guilty.
 

Back
Top Bottom