coyo: we pay these people to be professionals, to uphold the law, to reasonably keep the peace, to enforce reasonable laws, and to hold themselves up to scrutiny (they must be credible). The police have broken all five of those trusts, some worse than others. Why should the "good" be considered as news, frankly, when there should be no bad?
I had a long reply to this however something happened either with the site or my computer and I can't be fussed to re-type it all. To summarize; there is good and bad in every profession as every profession is made up of humans. Human nature will have some that buck the rules to satisfy their own wants. Those people, be it cops, doctors, bus drivers, bank tellers, etc... should be held accountable.
You, Shaman, will profess that all police are bad, full stop. Even your most recent post states; "
The police have broken all five of those trusts,
some worse than others" insinuating that all are bad. With over 5000 cops in Toronto, how come then that you don't hear of 5000 bad cops? You would suggest that they simply haven't been caught yet. I'll suggest that the vast majority are doing a good job.
In your opinion, "Why should the "good" be considered as news, frankly, when there should be no bad?" By that account, there should be no bad government, no bad companies, no bad people at all. But there is, because as I mentioned, it's human nature.
Because only talking about the bad creates an Us vs. Them mentality that fosters protection of the bad, rather than incentive for the good. Human nature is what it is.
^ This. Shaman, you are a purveyor of the "Us vs Them" in regards to police. I'll give you this; you're very adamant and strong willed, too bad that it paints you to also be close-minded.