Law Enforcement - The Good, The Bad, The Ugly.....

Who was in the wrong?

  • Cop

    Votes: 23 20.7%
  • Dude who got shot

    Votes: 33 29.7%
  • I like turtles

    Votes: 55 49.5%

  • Total voters
    111
tHdEIza.jpg


this one he actually gave up trying to get back on the force though his jail time was negligible.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/krawetz.asp

The image shown above stems from a May 2009 incident at the Twin River Casino in Lincoln, Rhode Island, during which Lincoln police officer Edward Krawetz was captured on video kicking Donna Levesque in the head as she sat handcuffed on the curb outside the casino after being removed from the premises for disorderly behavior.
Krawetz was suspended without pay and subsequently tried for assault with a dangerous weapon in connection with the incident; he was convicted in March 2012, after which he was sentenced to 10 years in prison (with all 10 years of the sentence being suspended) and ordered to attend mental health counseling:
A three-day administrative hearing began in June 2012 to determine whether Officer Krawetz should be allowed to keep his position with the Lincoln police force:

Convicted Lincoln Police Officer Edward Krawetz was a no-show on the first day of an administrative hearing to determine if he can continue to wear a badge.

The 12-year veteran of the force is fighting to keep his job after he was convicted of felony assault in March. The case is best known for video from a security camera at Twin River in Lincoln showing Krawetz kicking a handcuffed woman to the head.

Under the Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights, a three-member panel of police officers will decide his professional fate after what is expected to be three days of hearings.
Attorney Vincent Ragosta represents the town of Lincoln for the hearing. He declined to go into details about what happened behind closed doors but said Krawetz faces six administrative counts.
"The final charge is conviction of a felony involving conduct which amounts to moral turpitude or which shocks the conscience of a reasonable person," Ragosta said.
A Twin River surveillance camera recorded Krawetz kicking Donna Levesque, who was sitting on a curb near the officer at the time. Levesque was told to leave the slot parlor for unruly behavior right before the May 31, 2009 kick to the head.

Ragosta said they have requested Levesque to testify at the Bill of Rights hearing but that have not gotten response yet from her.
Krawetz was also convicted of misdemeanor assault in 2001 after an off-duty confrontation with a man who was jogging in Cumberland. He was suspended from the police force for 30 days following that conviction, and town officials recommended to the police chief at the time that Krawetz should be fired.

Krawetz has been suspended without pay but still receives health benefits and "other benefits" according to Ragosta.
The hearing was scheduled to resume and consider testimony on <NOBR>21 August</NOBR> 2012, but Officer Krawetz resigned from the force a week prior to that. In a <NOBR>15 August</NOBR> 2012 news release issued by Town Administrator T. Joseph Almond's office, the town announced it had "accepted an unconditional and irrevocable resignation from Officer Edward Krawetz."

 
Rarely do i ever side a cop...and honestly i think that cop deserves his job back...that woman kicked him and he kicked her back as a sign to "stfu". **** that ******* woman
 
Rarely do i ever side a cop...and honestly i think that cop deserves his job back...that woman kicked him and he kicked her back as a sign to "stfu". **** that ******* woman

he claimed self defence... if the cop can't handle a barefoot woman in hand cuffs he's not really fit to do his job...

also, considering he was deemed guilty of assault with a deadly weapon for that action it's kinda telling that he's in the wrong. only reason he didn't do time is because he was a cop.
 
Men With Guns

You have to obey the rules but the men with guns don't. Incidentally, there's a rule which states you may not have the guns.

Some food for thought.



2013-08-10163641_cr_zpsed6fe17d.jpg
 
Re: Men With Guns

Since when did PARKING ENFORCEMENT carry guns??? But the point is correct the "supervisor" should not have parked their vehicle in this spot and should have been tagged.

You have to obey the rules but the men with guns don't. Incidentally, there's a rule which states you may not have the guns.

Some food for thought.



2013-08-10163641_cr_zpsed6fe17d.jpg
 
Re: Men With Guns

Since when did PARKING ENFORCEMENT carry guns???

Parking Enforcement are part of Toronto Police Services. They are full-on police like any other. It's like assuming the Intelligence Division of the Army aren't part of the Army because they're not front-line troops -- a fallacy.
 
Re: Men With Guns

Parking Enforcement are part of Toronto Police Services. They are full-on police like any other. It's like assuming the Intelligence Division of the Army aren't part of the Army because they're not front-line troops -- a fallacy.

AFAIK Parking enforcement is a part of the Police services however they are civilian employees and they do not carry weapons.
http://www.torontopolice.on.ca/careers/civ_job_categories.php
 
Re: Men With Guns

Ok, people seem to be having some difficulty understanding, here.

The point was not "the guns".

It saddens me to have to spend so much time focusing on this.
 
Re: Men With Guns

Ok, people seem to be having some difficulty understanding, here.

The point was not "the guns".

It saddens me to have to spend so much time focusing on this.

And I conceded the point was the illegal parking, in my reply.

But it WAS YOU who titled the thread men WITH GUNS.

Parking enforcement officers fall under Toronto Police Services Board, true but they do not carry firearms, nor do they have powers of arrest, or can they perform other "police duties", such as traffic stops, traffic enforcement. A Civilian employee of Toronto police services, (say Chiefs administrative assistant, also falls under Toronto Police services Board), Does that mean he/she is a "men with guns"??? LOL
 
Re: Men With Guns

Are you sure the law doesn't allow them to park in some no parking zones while performing their duties?
 
Re: Men With Guns

Are you sure the law doesn't allow them to park in some no parking zones while performing their duties?

On one hand; people complain because it takes police too long to respond to a call.

On the other hand; people complain when police are attending a call and park where; 1. it's close to the call, and 2. it's close to return to their vehicle to respond to the next call.

Deduction; people just want to complain.

On the other hand, if the above points re; parking enforcement officers of the TPS are true; then that person wouldn't be responding to an emergency call so they shouldn't be parked there.
 
Re: Men With Guns

Another possibility is that he was loading bikes onto what appears to be a bike rack. In that case I believe it would be considered 'standing' rather than 'parking' because the driver remains with the vehicle.

But guns. Ya.
 
Re: Men With Guns

Ok, people seem to be having some difficulty understanding, here.

The point was not "the guns".

It saddens me to have to spend so much time focusing on this.

No difficulty in comprehension at all.

It saddens me you don't get the facts we have been pointing out.

Parking enforcement are not "men with guns" (as you state it in the OP) and they are not "full on Police" (as you state) because they are civilian employees without powers of arrest, etc.

I only mentioned they "do not carry weapons" as part of my re-enforcement that they are not police officers or "men with guns" as per your initial statements. A more apt title would have been "people with ticket printing machines and radios"

Your the one focusing on guns. As for the "illegal" parking, while they should lead by example not everybody does. Maybe call them out on it when you see it. Besides infernobuster is right, they park where they like to do their job, it just the nature of it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom