In the case of Iran, it goes back to 1953 and the CIA-run coup of their democratically-elected prime minister. The US and Britain seemed to not like the thought that he was demanding a better deal for Iranian oil and would nationalize their oil industry if a better deal was not to be had.
That coup led to the US-supported installation of a military dictatorship (remember the Shah of Iran) whose excesses led to the violent overthrow by the mullahs. That in turn led to the US encouraging and arming Saddam's Iraq with weapons by which to go to a long and bloody war with Iran.
You do see how that might inspire a certain degree of animosity towards the West, right? If you go back to those roots, much mischief on the part of Iran can be laid at the feet of gross Western interference with the Iranian people's right to determine their own fate. Do you really think the mad mullahs could have risen to such prominence without the chain of events driven by that coup back in the 50's?
In that sense, yes, the West can be seen as being in at least good part responsible for where we are now with Iran.
If there is such animosity to the west why are all these muslims from multiple countries immigrating to the west???????
because they can't build a civilized society with infrastructure and social support so they want to be parasites on the one the west built and then try and turn it back into mud hut, donkey loving ,backwards 400 AD.
and the morons like jihadi john who were born into a civilized society and a succesful family prove that this religion and especially those who follow it to the letter are mostly morons
Last edited: