JG clearly has issues, but thats not the real issue here.
the real issue is that JG is/was/whatever fired from his job because of these allegations.
These accusations are coming from past sexual partners of his.
Obviously JG is into some BDSM, he has never hidden this, in fact he gave videos of this freely.
I still believe these women were willing participants at the time. If anyone felt used,abused at anytime, they could have went to the police, yet no-one did
remember when the 50 shades of Grey book came out, that all women talked about.
its my belief that some of these ladies delved into a scene that maybe wasnt for them.
Im thinking any woman that has a hand up where it shouldnt be would respond with maybe scratching eyes out, or kicks to the sack or any other kind of self defence wounds.
why are women coming out of the woodwork and saying things now ? who knows... who knows why women do what they do, they are totally irrational. lol
remember, the first person to be open and honest was JG
I dont think he did anything wrong, only for the fact that no-one went to police within a reasonable timeframe
out of curiosity who has the newest complaint, and how long ago was it ?
all men should be watching this case carefully.
what if an old ex decides one day that you did the same ?
using food/ fruit/handcuffed to bed hot wax/ feathers.
thats assault/torture/kidnapping rape.
its a slippery slope,folks.
You seem to be taking his FB post at face value. He was first to speak out because that's basic PR strategy; get ahead of the story so people get your version of events first and the subsequent avalanche doesn't crush you.
You're right though, one of the key questions is if the CBC wrongfully dismissed him. That's what Jian said, and maybe they did but it's odd. The CBC isn't run by amateurs, they have all the HR and legal advice they need, and they are one of the more forward-thinking employers out there. They also had plenty more reason to keep him than get rid of him with the success of Q.
The other claim he made in that post is that one jilted ex-lover was going around rallying up other women to make this accusation against him. So either these other women had no beef with him and are all just plain malicious, or they all have a reason to begrudge him which they never spoke out about before.
When his FB post came out I kept these questions in the back of my head and reserved judgement for later when the rest of the story came out. Well, it turns out that the CBC has explicit video information that no one else has which they deem incriminating enough to warrant their response. And many of the women who have come forward are telling the same story and never knew about each other until now.
There's simply no rational way Jian's FB post can be taken seriously given all that. The CBC would have to be run by retarded knuckle-dragging numbskulls and the women would have had to be concocting this grand strategy for about a decade. I mean, people can choose to believe that those things are true and that a guy who happens to like being dominant during sex couldn't also be a rapist. But those people would be delusional.
It's funny that a forum that thrives on hating the police, repeatedly denouncing how useless they are in recovering stolen bikes and defending us from home invasions, also claims the police are the required go-to people for a rape victims or they can't be taken seriously. What a double standard!
Chances are that his eventual charges will lead to nothing, because there will be a lack of proof. And that's fine for the justice system. Just like the rest of us don't need to worry about jilted exes deciding to go to the cops based on our own consensual fetish sex. Like you said, that's not what this is about. This is about how society reacts to allegations of rape both professionally (CBC), legally (cops), and socially (us). And it's a very very ugly answer.
