No landing? Is he walking or on wheels?Built dad some new stairs.View attachment 58581View attachment 58582
No room for a landing, the door opens into the house and has an automatic opener. There isn't room or need for a landing.No landing? Is he walking or on wheels?
2) Notwithstanding Subrule 1), the entire branch circuit need not be provided with arc-fault
protection where
a) an outlet branch-circuit-type arc-fault circuit interrupter is installed at the first outlet on the
branch circuit; and
b) the wiring method for the portion of the branch circuit between the branch circuit
overcurrent device and the first outlet consists of metal raceway, armoured cable, or
non-metallic conduit or tubing.
It has to be cheaper to buy proper breakers than to construct that monstrosity. Kudos to you for checking the code for alternate solutions though.RE AFCIs. Looks like you can get an AFCI receptacle for $50 that provides protection downstream. Except this kick in the nuts
Except for dedicated branch circuits, like laundry room, I can't see why it wouldn't be allowed to nipple out of the panel to to an AFCI receptacle and then continue from there with NMD90. Having a whole pony panel with AFCIs nippled to it would be an awesome sight.
For a DIYer the best option if you are going that way IMO, line up the outlet boxes on the panel board and feed each one with armoured cable, NMSC after the AFCI outlet. Turn them all sideways to save space. Attaching the outlet boxes directly to the panel (even a sub panel) will take up a lot of space and it will reduce the number of lines you can have out of the panel (inefficient use of the knock-outs). IMO, better to just shop around for better prices (than big box) on the AFCI breakers, at best the above will save 50% but more likely only a 20% savings once you factor it all in. Sometimes it is just worth it to spend a little extra.RE AFCIs. Looks like you can get an AFCI receptacle for $50 that provides protection downstream. Except this kick in the nuts
Except for dedicated branch circuits, like laundry room, I can't see why it wouldn't be allowed to nipple out of the panel to to an AFCI receptacle and then continue from there with NMD90. Having a whole pony panel with AFCIs nippled to it would be an awesome sight.
The other option that would be weird but probably code compliant is multi-gang boxes. Conduit into box and then 4+ receptacles on different circuits. Be careful with box fill. Inspector will look very closely. AFCI breakers make more sense if you are doing many circuits even if they cost more.For a DIYer the best option if you are going that way IMO, line up the outlet boxes on the panel board and feed each one with armoured cable, NMSC after the AFCI outlet. Turn them all sideways to save space. Attaching the outlet boxes directly to the panel (even a sub panel) will take up a lot of space and it will reduce the number of lines you can have out of the panel (inefficient use of the knock-outs). IMO, better to just shop around for better prices (than big box) on the AFCI breakers, at best the above will save 50% but more likely only a 20% savings once you factor it all in. Sometimes it is just worth it to spend a little extra.
It will depend on the inspector, but they will either really like your ingenuity and code understanding or think you are trying to game the system, cutting corners, which means they will look at everything else much more closely (which is also OK as it will all be done 100% perfectly to code....).
I'm not anti safety but where does one draw the line at diminishing returns?For a DIYer the best option if you are going that way IMO, line up the outlet boxes on the panel board and feed each one with armoured cable, NMSC after the AFCI outlet. Turn them all sideways to save space. Attaching the outlet boxes directly to the panel (even a sub panel) will take up a lot of space and it will reduce the number of lines you can have out of the panel (inefficient use of the knock-outs). IMO, better to just shop around for better prices (than big box) on the AFCI breakers, at best the above will save 50% but more likely only a 20% savings once you factor it all in. Sometimes it is just worth it to spend a little extra.
It will depend on the inspector, but they will either really like your ingenuity and code understanding or think you are trying to game the system, cutting corners, which means they will look at everything else much more closely (which is also OK as it will all be done 100% perfectly to code....).
It's a chicken and egg mess. House prices to the moon so regulatory agencies keep pushing for more as incremental cost is low when viewed as a percentage. If we could build houses to ~1984 code (2x4 etc), we could probably knock down cost to build by a substantial percentage (save a lot of materials and some on labour as wood was smaller, you didn't need the added layer of external insulation etc). Those houses are still standing and have few issues.I'm not anti safety but where does one draw the line at diminishing returns?
All this stuff adds to house prices. Not our problem says ESA and similar organizations.
Canada doesn't have the demographics of Scandinavia. Hopefully it doesn't become Switzerland where houses get safety / renovation checks every year.
OUCH. I just a got a quote for a new front door and side light, custom sized sliding patio door and a large 3 piece picture window. Installed all in for $10,750.So my front door system was finally installed yesterday , it’s a pretty expensive project so I was expecting a pretty nice install . Nope . Old caulking visible around the perimeter, new caulking gooped on the doorbell button, interior trim stain dripped onto the slate floor and the exterior ceramic sill chipped off . I’ll be having a conversation with the store owner today , his installer was a nice fellow but a bit of a dunce .
I’m really tired of paying professional contractors for an install that looks like I did it . It’s an $11,000 door system , I expected better .
Sent from my iPhone using GTAMotorcycle.com
Hardware is also easier to inspect and can generate recurring revenue (I'm not sure on the certification process whether there is a per device fee or just pay once to get certified).I guess the builder industry prefers push-in speed of installation, so the ESA patches the issue while appeasing builders by mandating AFCIs. It's always easier to pass on the cost of hardware than labor.
Postal code pricing. Add in the mandatory $1000 upcharge because they see copper on his roof and here we are.OUCH. I just a got a quote for a new front door and side light, custom sized sliding patio door and a large 3 piece picture window. Installed all in for $10,750.
They (AFCI) were originally required in bedrooms more or less like you noted, also things like lamp cords, etc. that get tightly folded over when a dresser is pushed against the wall. The original ones were actually AFCI and looked for series faults only. The newer CAFI (combination arc fault interrupter) looks for both series faults and parallel/shorts but ones that do not reach the breaker amperage, they are the ones required now AFAIK but AFCI became a generic term (might be important as actual AFCI only old stock may still be kicking around???), they will usually have different colour test buttons IME. Many argue that it is the breaker manufactures that are the conspiracy behind them to increase usage to make more money... The first AFCIs I used had a slight buzzing sound, CAFI ones now do not seem to.It was more of a mental flex for fun than advice.
I was looking into why we got to where we are with AFCIs. I went to trade school when AFCIs were only required in bedrooms. The code teacher said their purpose is to protect against sparking between receptacles and plugs. He said a common cause of fires is whipping out vacuum cords, which spark and ignite curtains and drapes. Considering the current code, it seems like AFCIs purpose is to protect all wiring and devices. Sure, but where does it end? IMHO the push-in wire connections are a more concerning source of issues. I guess the builder industry prefers push-in speed of installation, so the ESA patches the issue while appeasing builders by mandating AFCIs. It's always easier to pass on the cost of hardware than labor.
Becoming far too common unfortunately.I’m really tired of paying professional contractors for an install that looks like I did it . It’s an $11,000 door system , I expected better .
Sent from my iPhone using GTAMotorcycle.com
Sadly, no matter how much you pay it is hard to find someone that will do a better job than you will. You will be slower but you care more.Becoming far too common unfortunately.
Did the contractor sub the work out?So my front door system was finally installed yesterday , it’s a pretty expensive project so I was expecting a pretty nice install . Nope . Old caulking visible around the perimeter, new caulking gooped on the doorbell button, interior trim stain dripped onto the slate floor and the exterior ceramic sill chipped off . I’ll be having a conversation with the store owner today , his installer was a nice fellow but a bit of a dunce .
I’m really tired of paying professional contractors for an install that looks like I did it . It’s an $11,000 door system , I expected better .
Sent from my iPhone using GTAMotorcycle.com