Not a history book but I do recommend picking up the book Germs, Guns and Steel
It's quasi-history through a non-fiction analysis of human evolution and well thought out.
Not a history book but I do recommend picking up the book Germs, Guns and Steel
I would think the catholic church would be fighting to get this information out...
Cowessess First Nation Chief Cadmus Delorme said that, according to local oral history, up to 75 per cent of the interred are children who attended Marieval residential school, which was run by the Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate.
By not being willing to send the dead kids home for burial. The Church assumes responsibility of their graves. And did a piss poor job at that as well.
Not quite. The church would ask for reimbursement for coffins etc. for a proper burial or transportation costs to return the body to the reserve (knowing that in all likelihood they couldn't pay). Same, but not same same.
They took the responsibility for the kids. It was their responsibility to return them.
It is the moral responsibility for anyone with kids in their care to see to them. Not just dispose of them once government funding is cut because the child is no longer living.
I said your claim that they weren't willing to return the deceased children was wrong.
The policy is recorded in an undated memorandum by J. D. McLean, who was departmental secretary from 1897 to 1933. According to McLean,
"When a pupil dies at a residential school, it is considered by this Department that the school authorities should be responsible for the expenses."
In 1938, Catherine Lacore requested that the body of her son, who was dying of tubercular meningitis at the Spanish school, be sent to her in Cornwall, Ontario, for burial upon his death. The response from Indian Aairs to the school was:
"The expense of a long journey such as this would be, would entail an expenditure which the Department does not feel warranted in authorizing."
“Ordinarily the body will be returned to the reserve for burial only when transportation, embalming costs and all other expenses are borne by next of kin. Transportation may be authorized, however, in cases where the cost of burial on the reserve is sufficiently low to make transportation economically advantageous.”
When Charles Hunter drowned while attending the Fort Albany, Ontario, school, it was decided, without consultation with his parents, to bury him in Moosonee rather than send his body home to Peawanuck near Hudson Bay.
Students who died at school were rarely sent home unless their parents could aord to pay for transportation. Unless they lived in close proximity to the school, most parents could not aord such costs.
Followed by;
“Ordinarily the body will be returned to the reserve for burial only when transportation, embalming costs and all other expenses are borne by next of kin. Transportation may be authorized, however, in cases where the cost of burial on the reserve is sufficiently low to make transportation economically advantageous.”
So you support your statement that the church wasn't willing to return dead children by posting a quote saying that they were, provided the expenses were covered............
The policy is recorded in an undated memorandum by J. D. McLean, who was departmental secretary from 1897 to 1933. According to McLean,
"When a pupil dies at a residential school, it is considered by this Department that the school authorities should be responsible for the expenses."
According to Chapleau, Ontario, student Michael Cachagee, the students had to help dig the graves. It is a memory that has haunted him all his life. In a 2010 media account, he said that because the graves dug in the winter were shallow, in the spring, bears would root about in the cemetery and feed on the student remains.
In fact, several bodies were piled up in an empty cabin because there was no grave ready. A large common grave was dug for them.
None of that alters the fact that they were willing to send the bodies back to the reserves. All you've done is reiterate (ad nauseam) that they were being obtuse about doing so.
More information on residential school burials... that doesn't fit the narative
I would think the catholic church would be fighting to get this information out...
But no.
What part of it doesn't matter if there was shenanigans, they were willing to send the bodies back don't you understand?
It does matter, at minimum it's breach of contract from their responsibilities they agreed to when becoming a residential school. But not only defrauding the government, but also defrauding the parents for money they are responsible to spend, well that under Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46) Section 301, comes with up to a 14 year jail sentence.
But keep believing whatever you'd like.
What part is "same old same old"Nothing new... to anyone that actually pays attention to the stories.
What part is "same old same old"
The part where the un-documented cemetery outside the residential school was actually well documented?
Or the part where what they thought was an un-documented residential school cemetery was actually a well documented parish cemetery that was used by everybody of the parish and peoples beyond for over 120 years?
Or the part where it has been proven the Catholic church has documentation on what was thought to be a residential school cemetery, when they keep saying they don't?
Or the part where the parish priest had a hissy fit and had all the headstones in a parish cemetery removed?
I guess I've been snoozin' then. This is all new to me... and to CBC News.
Can you give us more info on these "nothing new" instances like this... you know... cuz YOU'RE paying attention, and we're not.