One step forward....two steps back...
Building code change would have seen vastly expanded EV charging capability in coming years
www.pelhamtoday.ca
Jennifer French is funnier than she realizes. "and it is something the NDP will put in place if they govern following the 2026 election,". There is no world where ndp is winning the next election.
" French argued that adding the infrastructure from the get-go is actually the more affordable solution." So adding $1000 to the cost of every new dwelling is more affordable than the few percent that charge at home adding circuits?
"The costs of upgrading a home to allow for electric vehicle charging can be as much as $3,000 to $5,000." Complete BS. No new home would need a service upgrade for EV charging. How about we add in cost comparisons of EV charging in a knob and tube house too as justification to add circuits in new builds?
"Kamloops has taken a lead. The B.C. city passed a bylaw that mandates EV charging requirements in all new residential developments and as of last year under municipal law all new residential buildings have to have Level 2 EV charging infrastructure for at least one parking space per unit. It is the type of bold, forward looking leadership French wants to see inside Queen’s Park." What a moron. You want to make affordable housing unaffordable quickly, install enough electrical for a few hundred concurrent level two chargers.
Completely delusional as I would expect from NDP. Infinite money for all hairbrained schemes. It would be an order of magnitude cheaper to provide a $1000 rebate for anyone that installed a charger and let them roll out organically and actually targeted at locations charging EV's. Maybe require one level 2 charger for every 50 dwellings in a building. Most condo dwellers don't have a driving pattern that requires frequent level 2 chargers.
As has been shown by GTAM members with BEV's, level 2 may be nice to have but for the vast majority of people that are well served by a BEV, level 2 is not required.
As for the timing of this article, it is quite poorly written but it looks like douggie made the changes she is mad about almost six years ago. She is just stomping her feet and trying to be relevant (poorly imo).