wsj takes trump to task

Forum Sponsor
Neil_V said:
Why would I bother? Besides the fact that you can predict what each one is going to write based on their historical political leanings, you have, in this thread, immediately discredited linked materials possibly opposing your view without even looking at them based on their "bias" source, MSM or not, meanwhile parroting the Liberal Left outlets.. It's tiresome and frankly I've lost interest in having the discussion as it were. Ask me to hold your hand so you can snap it off; no thanks. Follow the issue yourself, my opinion has been echoed in numerous places, left and right.
Click to expand...
It's immensely gratifying for me to be your get out of jail card for escaping answers you might not like to questions you've asked, since in this thread alone I...
- discredited linked materials
- didn't even look at them
- pointed out all their bias
- parroted the left media

After all, why should you be interested in discovering possible answers to your questions as long as there are people like me out there who are so incapable of facing the truth, right? Better to go on an information strike until everyone else can be as honest and fair as you are.

Oh by the way, you may want to illustrate at least a single instance where I did anything you accuse me of above, otherwise it might look like you're the dishonest one looking for excuses to avoid the truth. Just trying to help.
 
turns out hilarious got some timely fbi news of her own.. whereas trump beaver stuff has become mute,

now it's about wieners..
fastar1 said:
I consider the timing of the realease of the damning video to be merciful. If it had been released during the primaries, we may never have known the true depth of depravity that GOP electors are capable of, and if it had been released after a Trump win it would harm more than just him. And if it had never been released, something else would have come along to finally unveil the true ugly face of The Donald, potentially doing even more harm than a sex abuse scandal could do.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
fastar1 said:
It's immensely gratifying for me to be your get out of jail card for escaping answers you might not like to questions you've asked, since in this thread alone I...
- discredited linked materials
- didn't even look at them
- pointed out all their bias
- parroted the left media

After all, why should you be interested in discovering possible answers to your questions as long as there are people like me out there who are so incapable of facing the truth, right? Better to go on an information strike until everyone else can be as honest and fair as you are.

Oh by the way, you may want to illustrate at least a single instance where I did anything you accuse me of above, otherwise it might look like you're the dishonest one looking for excuses to avoid the truth. Just trying to help.
Click to expand...

Jesus Christ man.. there is no truth yet! NO ONE KNOWS exactly what they might actually pertain to... It's all just opinion. I offed a reasonable opinion and you went out of your way to take a piss. Again why should I bother.. Get over it.
 
Neil_V said:
Jesus Christ man.. there is no truth yet! NO ONE KNOWS exactly what they might actually pertain to... It's all just opinion. I offed a reasonable opinion and you went out of your way to take a piss. Again why should I bother.. Get over it.
Click to expand...
So now I went out of my way to take a piss. Moving goalposts but whatever, I still defy to to show me where I did any one of the things you accuse me of.

Maybe then you'll be able to explain your rationale for rejecting the offer to answer your question about the FBIs motives.
 
[video=youtube;-bYAQ-ZZtEU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bYAQ-ZZtEU[/video]
 
LOL ... it's a mess with a lot of conflict of interests. You have a guy who apparently has integrity, but he reports to a boss who is supposed to lay charges against a candidate who belongs to the party of your own and your own boss.

I mean, I don't think that people seriously believe that FBI is somehow impartial, or can be impartial institution, particularly in this sort of investigation. The only reason he probably came out was because his own employees would if he didn't ... today's social media ******** makes this sort of leaks so easy.

I doubt they can pull a pin on him now, because it would look mega suspicious, I mean more suspicious than it is know ... the guy has a cushy 10-year deal and I think he's in year 2 or 3?
 
And now you have the DOJ assistant attorney General Peter Kadzik brought into the investigation to stand over the FBI's shoulder with a hurry up mandate... The same Peter Kadzik who had dinner with Podesta's the day after Hillary's Benghazi testimony. Yeah, it's Comey's integrity the world should be worried about.. lmao
 
trump kept repeating the 4 star general getting ~ 4 years for lying to the fbi vs how it went for hillary,


that made no sense, was bound to backfire ugly one way or another & or come to roost,


turned out trump was right on the money pressing that point vs nothing resulting from the alleged russian putin trump dems bs
 
Last edited:
If Trump can stay on point and keep showing if it was not for him and the other supporters then there would be no investigation.
Keep hammering why the General gets punished but not Clinton?

Keep seeding what else don't we know...if he can have humility and say things like you may not like what I have said or how I said things, that's fair but at least I am who I am and you get what you see, no smoke and mirrors. I am here to give us the bad tasting medicine that will get us better.

If Trump kept doing that, he would take this thing to the wire.
Start telling the kids to wake up...they are going to be the big losers here.

just saying, but wow, like the World Series, down to the wire.
 
and just the other day, 24/7 beav chatter lol, the latest dem commercials are lame & pathetic, what a surprise..

obi wan kenobi is also desperately babbling legacy irrelevence,

looks like an old vs new showdown to me, at the ok corral lol...
 
Last edited:
knucklesound said:
Minnesota children fit into his stereotyped mainly white, 'non-college educated' support base, so maybe not all that surprising. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Ummm... you do know that Minnesota was last taken by the Republicans in 72 right? So yeah, I'll stand by surprising...
 
I meant appeal to all the young voters.
Hey I am rich, I am older and been around and I am here to tell you that things are not in your favor.
The game is rigged against you. My kids will be fine but I am concerned about the rest of you getting a fair chance instead of paying taxes, robbed with student loans only to not be bale to buy a small house and decent car...you got to live at home with your parents to try and catch up. This is not the American way, I can tell you that as a fact.

It's your future, you decide...at least none of you can't say Trump did not try. Your future.

That would be the message to put out there. Show them how they are being used e.g. student loans
Give them questions to ponder,,,why are they telling all of you to get PHd's for the jobs of the future yet all we see is out sourcing or machines taking over.
Think about it, jobs of the future is not you, it's a computer or sent to someone in China or India. Think I am wrong, go look at your parents and grand parents.
Your old man had a mustang by 19, what do you have besides debt.
 
Neil_V said:
Ummm... you do know that Minnesota was last taken by the Republicans in 72 right? So yeah, I'll stand by surprising...
Click to expand...

Ummm...you do know that i was joking cause the poll was done on children who haven't finished high school yet-right? :rolleyes: Making light of the whole 'Trump-supporters-don't-have-a-post-secondary-education'....sheeesh.
I haven't seen anyone else suggesting Minnesota is even close to a 'swing state' and there remains very little chance Trump will be winning there anyway- so whatever.
Maybe we could see Trump supporters using this poll as proof that the election was RIGGGGGGGED!!!!...

18hnyh.jpg
Forum Sponsor
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom