Running from police. | Page 25 | GTAMotorcycle.com

Running from police.

AlienTech said:
that's one of the most retarded statements I've read on this site and there are a lot LOL!

didn't you read the guy's blog, linked a couple posts above, on how he was treated by the boyz in blue??? cops are untrustworthy, have little accountability when they make mistakes so they continue on making mistakes and we the people pay for them..

cops make me want to vomit.
Click to expand...

If your career depends on having a license, maybe you shouldn't be riding like a tool on the street.

I knew a guy that drove a Culligan water truck for a living, he did quite well, i knew him through a job i used to have working on Mustangs. He had a '92 5.0L Vert wtih about 600hp. I've never seen such a fast car driven so slowly. He understood the importance of keeping his license.

reciprocity said:
I've got about 500,000 km on the roads in ontario in the last 5 years in various vehicles and I've yet to have a cop even notice me.

I've got lots of Tattoos, I drive late at night on weekends and holidays, I drive just above the speed limit,

Am I doing something wrong?

I'd like to be pulled over so I have an angry story to share and I can make blog entries about how much I hate police.

I feel kinda left out.
Click to expand...

I think a Grand Cherokee rates pretty low on the heat-score-scale.
 
caboose483 said:
If your career depends on having a license, maybe you shouldn't be riding like a tool on the street.

I knew a guy that drove a Culligan water truck for a living, he did quite well, i knew him through a job i used to have working on Mustangs. He had a '92 5.0L Vert wtih about 600hp. I've never seen such a fast car driven so slowly. He understood the importance of keeping his license.



I think a Grand Cherokee rates pretty low on the heat-score-scale.
Click to expand...
having a 600 hp street car is nothing more then overcompensation for micro penis syndrome. Whats the point of having it and not using it
 
"Fight the power! They're all trying to keep us down!" - Rpm
 
DAYTONA said:
having a 600 hp street car is nothing more then overcompensation for micro penis syndrome. Whats the point of having it and not using it
Click to expand...

You can drive it to test-n-tune nights at the drag strip, run 10's, then drive it home.

reciprocity said:
I've had the GC for less than 2 years.

same experience with and Audi S4 and a corvette.
Click to expand...

How far is McDonalds from you? I know you only go out for cheese burgers.... what's that, about 500km per year??
 
DAYTONA said:
having a 600 hp street car is nothing more then overcompensation for micro penis syndrome. Whats the point of having it and not using it
Click to expand...

when was the last time you chose to do a track day with your bike instead of acting ilke a d-bag on the street, taunting police ?

props/points because you have a child and still do it
 
Rossi86 said:
Unfortunately, that's the same flawed logic that other people are having. Independent events have no effect on one another in probability. Every time you flip that coin the probability always remains 1/2 to get a head or tail. You're combining independent events which would not be the case with running from the cops. Of course the probability of getting caught varies with the rider's skills, traffic/weather conditions, location etc etc it's never a constant. But hypothetically, if it was a constant a rider would only need to worry about the chances of getting caught at the moment he's being chased NOT what happend last time he was chased, NOT what will happen next time he will be chased. The goal is to get away each time you're being chased not all the times combined. You make it sound harder by combining everything, but unfortunately independent events have no effect on one another!
Click to expand...

Statistical Analysis Fail.
 
Rossi86 said:
Unfortunately, that's the same flawed logic that other people are having. Independent events have no effect on one another in probability.
Click to expand...

You can't really say that it's flawed when you impose your own interpretation of it. I agree, from the practical point of view it only matters whether or not you get caught the next time. But if you make a resolution that you'll run every time a cop tries to pull you over, then implicitly there is an assumption of a series of future events, all of which you want to turn out in your favor.
 
Rossi86 said:
Unfortunately, that's the same flawed logic that other people are having. Independent events have no effect on one another in probability. Every time you flip that coin the probability always remains 1/2 to get a head or tail.
Click to expand...

Good explanation :)

And that's why gamblers are losers because they think their past performance has some effect on their current and future probability of winning. Most people know nothing about chance and probability.
 
AlienTech said:
Good explanation :)

And that's why gamblers are losers because they think their past performance has some effect on their current and future probability of winning. Most people know nothing about chance and probability.
Click to expand...

No, it's actually a terrible explanation. Its good to see you fall into that "most" you speak of.

If the odds of a successful run are say, X%, that value doesn't change based on any previous or subsequent run. The events themselves are mutually exclusive. However, the more events there are the more likely that sheer numbers will overcome the odds and you will have a run that is unsuccessful. The odds on that particular run didn't change, it's still a X% chance of success but for N number of events.. the odds of all being successful are:

P = X^N

X being a decimal between 0 and 1.
N being the number of events

This is why there's house limits at casinos, otherwise a simple double-up scheme would always end up winning.
 
Last edited:
Andreas said:
when was the last time you chose to do a track day with your bike instead of acting ilke a d-bag on the street, taunting police
Click to expand...
Dont hate because you aint got the balls to do what I do. You continue to go to the track and run your one way traffic with smooth roads and obstacle free environment. Waste your money on tire warmers lap timers etc etc and pretend your ROSSI lmfao. No where in motorsports are there so many wanna be's I'm a street rider I prowl that jungle daily. peace
 
Glad to see the statistics coming back...Rossi..your logic states that there's a 1/2 chance of flipping a coin 500 times and the coin giving 500 heads results. Did you know that!
 
You just repeated what the other poster said using different words LOL!, another good/same explanation :)

Having lived in Las Vegas and being involved in the gaming industry I know who wins and why :)

caboose483 said:
No, it's actually a terrible explanation. Its good to see you fall into that "most" you speak of.

If the odds of a successful run are say, X%, that value doesn't change based on any previous or subsequent run. The events themselves are mutually exclusive. However, the more events there are the more likely that sheer numbers will overcome the odds and you will have a run that is unsuccessful. The odds on that particular run didn't change, it's still a X% chance of success but for N number of events.. the odds of all being successful are:

P = X^n

X being a decimal between 0 and 1.

This is why there's house limits at casinos, otherwise a simple double-up scheme would always end up winning.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom