You have demonstrated that you don't know, either who or what.I know who the idioms are.
You have demonstrated that you don't know, either who or what.I know who the idioms are.
You have demonstrated that you don't know, either who or what.
Ten years later. Things haven't seemingly changed much. Hopefully you've been well and not encountered any more racer wannabes on our highways.Reviving a very old thread...... I was the OP on this. I am older (retired) and maybe a bit wiser...... jury is out on that one. Anyway, I still think about this incident 10 years on, especially when I still see how some riders drive. I also wonder if the person who "mirrored" me is still around? I am..... still driving VW's too.
All the best..... be safe, riders.
I did have my signal on.... he declined to acknowledge it.....Have you learned to signal that you're intending to get over as soon as you've completed your slow-pass?
I was still significantly above the speed limit. He was close enough on my bumper I did not brake check him, or he would have been in my back seat.Brake-checking is outlawed in Section 172 of the Ontario Highway Traffic Act, which bans stunt driving. The law specifically says it is illegal to brake-check or intentionally stop or slow down.
Drivers who brake-check can be ticketed for stunt driving, which can result in severe penalties, including:
- Fine between $2,000 and $10,000, along with a surcharge and court costs
- One to three-year suspension of your driver’s licence if you are convicted
- Mandatory attendance at a driver improvement course
- Six demerit points on your licence
- Up to six months in jail
- 14-day impoundment of your vehicle
I see them and ignore them. Yes I have been well. Not doing the commute into the GTA does wonders for ones well being....Ten years later. Things haven't seemingly changed much. Hopefully you've been well and not encountered any more racer wannabes on our highways.
I was still significantly above the speed limit. He was close enough on my bumper I did not brake check him, or he would have been in my back seat.
The intent of that section is for rapid deceleration, ie "brake checking." Slowing down when you're being tailgated is explicitly mentioned as the preferred way to deal with a tailgater in both the Driver's Handbook and on the driving test. It should be noted that tailgating is also listed in the racing and stunting definitions, by way of "driving a motor vehicle in a manner that indicates an intention to drive, without justification, as close as possible to another vehicle, pedestrian or fixed object on or near the highway."The law specifically says it is illegal to brake-check or intentionally stop or slow down.
Slowing down when you're being tailgated is explicitly mentioned as the preferred way to deal with a tailgater in both the Driver's Handbook and on the driving test. It should be noted that tailgating is also listed in the racing and stunting definitions, by way of "driving a motor vehicle in a manner that indicates an intention to drive, without justification, as close as possible to another vehicle, pedestrian or fixed object on or near the highway."
I don't think this particular rider needed any fuel in order to rage.The principle is to encourage the tailgater to pass, and implies you aren't in the passing lane. If you are, you should either move over or complete your pass. Slowing down in the passing lane whether you use your brakes or lay off the gas serves no purpose since the tailgater is blocked in with nowhere to go, and only fuels road rage.
I don't think this particular rider needed any fuel in order to rage.
Ah, so you are of the mindset I should have sped up and encouraged his behaviour. Good to know. It is that type of driving that causes accidents. It mostly is not the rider of the bike who is in the accident, but those who react by swerving to avoid a potential accident, causing a different accident.The law specifically says it is illegal to brake-check or intentionally stop or slow down.
Ah, so you are of the mindset I should have sped up and encouraged his behaviour.
It was not a "life defining" moment. I let it go a long time ago...... but was going thru old emails and saw it. Just made me wonder if the guy was still around, or if his riding "skills" caught up with him. 10 years is a lot of growing up. Who knows, maybe I'll revive it on the 20 year make as well.....I can't imagine letting a broken mirror be such a life defining event, that I would feel compelled to return to a forum 10 years later to continue arguing about it.
Might be time to let it go. Best way to "win" is to move on.
Clearly.... I let it go a long time ago.. .. maybe I'll revive it on the 20 year make as well... .