Um that was my point with Dani. Marc was able to pass Pedrosa because he made a mistake and ran wide. Not because Marc had a sudden urge to protect his so called best friend.
And yeah, I do have my eyes opened. I try to be as unbiased as possible. You questioning as to how Marc rides, then explain to me why no one brought up his riding in Indy this year? If you don't have a subscription, i'm sure johnscruiser has it in his archives. He was clearly the fastest man that weekend, and came race time, he stalked Lorenzo not showing a wheel pretty much all race. It was only near the end when he decided to go for it. Perhaps he had that same plan in Valencia, except this time Dani showed up and threw a wrench to that plan. So yeah...I don't know. You tell me. Would people be crying collusion if Marquez was 5 seconds behind Lorenzo? Probably. But even that result wouldn't have changed anything, even if Dani had won.
Another thing, Dani was struggling at the beginning part of Valencia. So what he did was to conserve and see if he can up his pace in the latter part of the race. I don't see anyone saying about this scenario being far-fetched. Yet when Marc explained it in PI, it was bullsh*t? Why the double standard? Why is no one commenting on Petrucci clearly moving over for Rossi? Is there collusion there?
1. All of a sudden your talking about the running wide... go back and read your own post, and realize, you were in fact talking about missed shifts.... So what are you talking about
2. Precisely the point everyone else is trying to make. Where was the move. I expected him to start seriously pressuring JL with 6 to go. When that never materialized, the jig was up. Indy he made the pass with over 3 laps to go; I don't understand what you're trying to argue
3. because Dani's lap times never deviated by more than a few tenths, and got progressively faster as the bike came to him. There was no talk of this overheat and than cool them off BS Marc has been selling
and lastly... thought you were done? :lmao: