Moral dilema

I think my ears just started bleeding.

Let's take care of your sense of reason next:

[video=youtube;389DkzjHpus]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=389DkzjHpus[/video]

There, that should teach you a lesson (speedos usually do).
 
Red and Foxxy trying to get some dude to show his moobs in this thread (possibly wearing a bikini top).

you forgot the ***_less chaps!!

Quiet you, you still have to atone for your Foxxy sins a.k.a. lack of quality perv pics of her during your lunch.

If you're good, we MAY show you some Red/sis pics. Maybe.

wrong guy... leave afelotreyu alone!! :)

It's your safest bet. Although, in another thread, Foxxy just admitted to riding in the rain in a white top (ZX600 destroyed that momentary nirvana by informing us all he wore the same top in said rain....now I can't get the image of hairy man tits from my mind - pass the eye bleach?).

Oh yeah, and Red in this thread was playing bumper cars IRL, and is now suggesting that her best course of action to atone for those sins is to don a MILF t-shirt (we're suggesting she try one on a size smaller and post it up here for us to...uh...review).

That should cover it all.

Excellent recap! You have earned a cookie!!
 
Excellent recap! You have earned a cookie!!

I'm so happy! Let me perform the dance of my people for you...

[video=youtube;84WpcmJ28Yg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=84WpcmJ28Yg[/video]
 
I know! It's shameful. I should have just got $800 off my mommy and given it to him on the spot and then begged for his forgiveness. Thanks for setting me straight! I am going to go and put on my "milf" t-shirt right now and march over there to take responsibility for my actions!!

sounds about right. you damage someone's property, you pay to fix it. not really seeing what's so difficult here.

Sent from my SGH-I896 using Tapatalk 2
 
sounds about right. you damage someone's property, you pay to fix it. not really seeing what's so difficult here.

Sent from my SGH-I896 using Tapatalk 2

sign_offtopic.gif


wait... maybe not! hmm.. what's going on here?

lmao
 
sounds about right. you damage someone's property, you pay to fix it. not really seeing what's so difficult here.

Sent from my SGH-I896 using Tapatalk 2

You must have a very interesting life :rolleyes: If we could all just live by absolute statements the world would be so....fuct!!!

By that rationale if he had asked for five thousand dollars for a scuffed bumper I should have just handed it over to him.
 
You must have a very interesting life :rolleyes: If we could all just live by absolute statements the world would be so....fuct!!!

By that rationale if he had asked for five thousand dollars for a scuffed bumper I should have just handed it over to him.
and by your rationale i can go damage the property of anyone who has ever wronged me and not have to pay for it. brilliant.


Sent from my SGH-I896 using Tapatalk 2
 
and by your rationale i can go damage the property of anyone who has ever wronged me and not have to pay for it. brilliant.


Sent from my SGH-I896 using Tapatalk 2

Maybe learn to read. I never established a "rationale" and I never stated damaging someones property and not fixing it was okay. Hence the title of this thread. I was going to be immoral by perhaps not agreeing to fix the damage and I posted to merely get an idea if anyone else would/could do such a thing and/or had a better solution which did not involve going against my morals. Writing an $800 cheque blindly because some one tells me too regardless of what I did would be the act of a moron.
Please do a better job of reading the thread if you are going to chime in. You must have had some clue that you were off track when you were the only person posting with your opinion.
 
and by your rationale i can go damage the property of anyone who has ever wronged me and not have to pay for it. brilliant.


The aggrieved party shouldn't profit in such a situation (I forget the legal term). Their property should be brought back to the same condition and that's it. Sounds like Red's cousin is trying to strongarm her for $800, then he'll either leave the scratch as is, or buff it out himself for materials and pocket $780. I'd balk at that as well, and so should she.
 
and by your rationale i can go damage the property of anyone who has ever wronged me and not have to pay for it. brilliant.


Sent from my SGH-I896 using Tapatalk 2

In threads such as this, it is usually assumed that the OP is being honest about things described. That's the only way any post after can have any merit one way or the other whatsoever. So with that in mind..

OTOH, you are not allowing at all, that I'm sure Red has already paid numerous times over just having to tolerate the presence of this low-life abusive slimeball cousin over the years. And for what? just because one of his parents happens to be one of Red's Mom's siblings? No...far more likely she is afraid of this low-life trash who goes around bullying anyone who doesn't bow down to his abusive demands.

And here you are, kellen, defending the piece of ****. What does that make you? Or maybe you're one of them..
 
The aggrieved party shouldn't profit in such a situation (I forget the legal term). Their property should be brought back to the same condition and that's it. Sounds like Red's cousin is trying to strongarm her for $800, then he'll either leave the scratch as is, or buff it out himself for materials and pocket $780. I'd balk at that as well, and so should she.

i'm not advocating just paying whatever number the guy pulls out of his ass. get a couple estimates, pick one, pay up.

Sent from my SGH-I896 using Tapatalk 2
 
Back
Top Bottom