Three bikes all capable of the same type of riding is a fail in my books.Cool story bro. I ride sport bikes I own 3 at the moment 1 with 387,000kms, 1 with 98,000kms, and 1 with 89,000kms.
Three bikes all capable of the same type of riding is a fail in my books.Cool story bro. I ride sport bikes I own 3 at the moment 1 with 387,000kms, 1 with 98,000kms, and 1 with 89,000kms.
I quess that depends on how many bikes you have total?Three bikes all capable of the same type of riding is a fail in my books.
I would love to know the details of a 387k bike? That's a bit unheard-of...Cool story bro. I ride sport bikes I own 3 at the moment 1 with 387,000kms, 1 with 98,000kms, and 1 with 89,000kms.
If he rides them that much, I say he's winning. If he had a collection of torture rack trailer queens, I would be with you.Fair enough. But it's still a fail if you have less than 5.
You rarely see hormones being blamed on men's behaviour -- but when it comes to motorsports my hypothesis is they are a major unreported cause of accidents and fatalities. I've seen it a thousand times, I think that often drives riders to wander past their skill threshold.Unfortunately a lot of stats do not record the most important statistic - regardless of age or type of motorcycle: it's *experience*.
Experience is hard to pin down, because it's not related to how many years you've had a motorcycle license, nor even how many kms you ride a year.
I've seen motorcycle commuters who put on 30,000kms a year demonstrate inferior handling skills compared to someone who rides less than 5,000 kms a year, but takes their sportbike out on the track or their dirtbike out in the forest on the weekends, pushing the limits of their motorcycle and their abilities in all the important areas of maneuverability, and traction management in acceleration and braking.
The commuter basically rides the same 1 km, 30,000 times a year and doesn't learn anything new from a skills perspective. The only experience they perhaps gain is more situational awareness in traffic, but may not have adequate mechanical skills to react to those adverse situations.
The age-related stats skews towards older riders because as PP mentioned, they are over-represented on the road, but also because many of them are just entering or re-entering motorcycling after decades of being absent from the scene (due to raising kids, career, etc).
While younger riders are forced to look at 250-500cc motorcycles because of insurance or price point, older riders with more disposable income are able to buy more bike they can handle, whether it's the shiny 700 lb bagger or 200 hp superbike.
IMO, this, coupled with *inexperience* is the reason why they are over-represented in the age-related crash statistics.
Inexperienced riders come in all ages. Unfortunately there are more older, inexperienced riders out there vs younger, inexperienced ones.
If that argument works to beat the ticket, I would hope that the jp medically suspends your license until you can get a doctor to sign off that your levels have been monitored and controlled for an extended period prior to license reinstatement (similar to process for seizures).You rarely see hormones being blamed on men's behaviour -- but when it comes to motorsports my hypothesis is they are a major unreported cause of accidents and fatalities. I've seen it a thousand times, I think that often drives riders to wander past their skill threshold.
IMHO Testosterone and Adrenaline force men to do stupid things on motorcycles.
I wonder if you could demand a blood test if you're pulled over? Use your T and A levels as a defense -- out of control and elevated levels altered your judgment and behavior.
I would say @Lightcycle gave a pretty good account.I remember this being touched on in my riding course in 2019.
The majority of new riders were much older (@Evoex and the other instructors can probably chime in on what the demographics of their classes is like) and was skewing the data that way. I think it was riders over 50 made up the largest group injury.
Older riders can usually afford the bikes that younger ones can't. Having your first bike being a loaded Road Glide is probably not the best idea.
good luck with that.The stats are often woefully incomplete. In Ontario we seem to only get the OPP numbers, what about municipalities and other non-provincially patrolled roads ? Age, years of riding, type of bike involved, weather, road conditions - these can contribute to a clearer understanding of what's really happening.
I have bugged the MCC and MMIC for years to try to get a handle on this, because it clearly influences the cost of insurance but I'm constantly met with the sound of crickets.
The stats show older people have the most motorcycle fatalities. It surprised me too but those are the facts. The idea that it's young inexperienced hooligans doing most of the crashing is just a myth.
There isn’t a lot of research on experience as a factor in crashes/fatalities but there is some.Unfortunately a lot of stats do not record the most important statistic - regardless of age or type of motorcycle: it's *experience*.
Experience is hard to pin down, because it's not related to how many years you've had a motorcycle license, nor even how many kms you ride a year.
I've seen motorcycle commuters who put on 30,000kms a year demonstrate inferior handling skills compared to someone who rides less than 5,000 kms a year, but takes their sportbike out on the track or their dirtbike out in the forest on the weekends, pushing the limits of their motorcycle and their abilities in all the important areas of maneuverability, and traction management in acceleration and braking.
The commuter basically rides the same 1 km, 30,000 times a year and doesn't learn anything new from a skills perspective. The only experience they perhaps gain is more situational awareness in traffic, but may not have adequate mechanical skills to react to those adverse situations.
The age-related stats skews towards older riders because as PP mentioned, they are over-represented on the road, but also because many of them are just entering or re-entering motorcycling after decades of being absent from the scene (due to raising kids, career, etc).
While younger riders are forced to look at 250-500cc motorcycles because of insurance or price point, older riders with more disposable income are able to buy more bike they can handle, whether it's the shiny 700 lb bagger or 200 hp superbike.
IMO, this, coupled with *inexperience* is the reason why they are over-represented in the age-related crash statistics.
Inexperienced riders come in all ages. Unfortunately there are more older, inexperienced riders out there vs younger, inexperienced ones.
I give up.good luck with that.
Cool story bro. I ride sport bikes I own 3 at the moment 1 with 387,000kms, 1 with 98,000kms, and 1 with 89,000kms.
That's just your own speculation, based on your already biased assumptions. Do you have any sources to prove any of those claims?
Having your first bike being a loaded Road Glide is probably not the best idea.
United States Department of Transportation puts out demographic and crash data. Lots of sites summarize it. You can google HSTA stats yourself, here's a law office condensation: Vulnerable Riders: What Age Group Is in Most Motorcycle Accidents?Vulnerable Riders: What Age Group Is in Most Motorcycle Accidents?
Well now, we're really going to tuck into this discussion.
One could easily draw a line between risk being greater riding in your local environment vs travelling across the country.
Sure, that's obvious..you get lazy, start thinking about dinner, etc.Statistics show that most accidents happen close to home.
The Majority Of Car Accidents Happen Close To Home | Call Now For A Free Consultation
Dolphin Technologies analyzed 3.22 million car trips between 2018 and 2019 and found that 25 percent of all accidents happened during the first three minuteswww.truscellolaw.com