H-D kills off more models ? | Page 9 | GTAMotorcycle.com

H-D kills off more models ?

I learned a lot about British engineering a long time ago. First by working on MGs, Triumphs and Jags, and later at a British electronics plant.

While working there I learned that in Britain "tenure was a big thing in engineering", so all new ideas came from the minds of old men.
With the right old men in place, I am ok with that. Sadly, those gems are few and far between.
 
With the right old men in place, I am ok with that. Sadly, those gems are few and far between.
It's really a thing, and a heavy contributor to the demise of heavy manufacturing and the transportation manufacturing sector in the UK. It's also prevalent in health care, the NHS relative performance is a pretty good study on how tenure based hierarchy can stifle innovation and performance.
 
It's really a thing, and a heavy contributor to the demise of heavy manufacturing and the transportation manufacturing sector in the UK. It's also prevalent in health care, the NHS relative performance is a pretty good study on how tenure based hierarchy can stifle innovation and performance.
Apparently (I haven't talked to those involved in almost two decades), the CN tower operates on a similar model. They are (were?) always for sale and nobody that worked there wanted to implement any changes that a potential owner may not like. So the whole team exists to maintain the status quo. wtf. Why would you pay a team of people to do almost nothing for years? Infuriating attitude. If I bought it, I would whack all of those wankers.
 
"A jet engine is a type of reaction engine discharging a fast-moving jet that generates thrust by jet propulsion."

Rockets use rocket propellant.
 
It's really a thing, and a heavy contributor to the demise of heavy manufacturing and the transportation manufacturing sector in the UK. It's also prevalent in health care, the NHS relative performance is a pretty good study on how tenure based hierarchy can stifle innovation and performance.
When you look at documentaries of the UK automotive and motorcycles sectors you see an enormous reluctance to innovate or invest in technology. "New" vehicles being made with parts designed 30 years ago and tooled in plants with worn out machinery meant poor performance and poor reliabilty. Tenure prevailed, but also a very ridgid class system where those who went to the right schools and came from the right families ran everything and everyone else was just a workie
 
When you look at documentaries of the UK automotive and motorcycles sectors you see an enormous reluctance to innovate or invest in technology. "New" vehicles being made with parts designed 30 years ago and tooled in plants with worn out machinery meant poor performance and poor reliabilty. Tenure prevailed, but also a very ridgid class system where those who went to the right schools and came from the right families ran everything and everyone else was just a workie

Would triumph be the exception? They do not innovate as much or push the boundaries in R&D but they definitely seem to be on par with other manufacturers in tech, performance and reliability.
Open to be proven wrong, just my thoughts looking at their lineup.
 
Would triumph be the exception? They do not innovate as much or push the boundaries in R&D but they definitely seem to be on par with other manufacturers in tech, performance and reliability.
Open to be proven wrong, just my thoughts looking at their lineup.

depends, you talking pre or post hinckley?

Speaking of triumphs, saw a triumph car today in hamilton :eek:
 
The current Triumph, Norton, Brough and Royal Enfield have nothing to do with the traditional British auto industry. They are not owned, made or designed by Brits.
The "traditional" British technology was designed in a pub and built in a shed.

The "traditional" british auto industry went down the tube in the '70s, in the end because of labour unrest. IIRC Ford Dagenham worked 70 days in 1974 because of strikes.
The Brits didn't invest in R&D, mostly because WW2 wrecked their economy, then they rebuilt their economy as a socialist heaven... which the workers thought applied to them... and they went on strike.
A LOT

The fact that the Brits OWN Formula 1 tech tells us they DO know how to build cars and bikes, they just have to figure out how to do it for profit.
 
Would triumph be the exception?

Yes, certainly.

I was referring to UK moto companies of the 60 - 70's, who rested on their laurels as the Japanese manufacturers overtook them in terms of technology, design, reliability and value.
 
You said it. And they killed off the V-Rod so they could produce the Street at their Kansas City plant, which they also killed off.

The Vrod would still be here if people bought them. Vrod was the fastest production motorcycle when it came out. Nobody bought. Who is going to buy one when Jap bikes are half the price?
 
"The Vrod would still be here if people bought them. Vrod was the fastest production motorcycle when it came out. Nobody bought. Who is going to buy one when Jap bikes are half the price?"

The V-Rod was a Porsche design and came out of the VR1000 road racing program. The Motor Company's big mistake (IMO) was building a power cruiser instead of a supersport bike a la Ducati.
BTW - I sincerely doubt it was the fastest production motorcycle when it came out. The Hayabusa and ZX14 clobbered it on top end, and I'm guessing the second generation VMax in the quarter mile. Your opinion (and results) may differ. :)
 
"The Vrod would still be here if people bought them. Vrod was the fastest production motorcycle when it came out. Nobody bought. Who is going to buy one when Jap bikes are half the price?"

The V-Rod was a Porsche design and came out of the VR1000 road racing program. The Motor Company's big mistake (IMO) was building a power cruiser instead of a supersport bike a la Ducati.
BTW - I sincerely doubt it was the fastest production motorcycle when it came out. The Hayabusa and ZX14 clobbered it on top end, and I'm guessing the second generation VMax in the quarter mile. Your opinion (and results) may differ. :)

No, their big mistake was thinking 20-something dolts who still live at home had $30,000 to spend. Yes, it was the fastest - two months later the 'busa came out and yes, it was faster on the top-end and $10,000 less. Even today though, I would take a Rod over a POS ugly 'busa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TK4
Would triumph be the exception? They do not innovate as much or push the boundaries in R&D but they definitely seem to be on par with other manufacturers in tech, performance and reliability.
Open to be proven wrong, just my thoughts looking at their lineup.
Triumph is the exception - they are still churning out some great stuff however most of their production is done in Asia.

As for the rest, India and Germany have conquered or rescued English car and bike brands
 
No, their big mistake was thinking 20-something dolts who still live at home had $30,000 to spend. Yes, it was the fastest - two months later the 'busa came out and yes, it was faster on the top-end and $10,000 less. Even today though, I would take a Rod over a POS ugly 'busa.
Before the Hayabusa, the CBR1100XX Blackbird (a name so cool I have to type it all out) and ZX-11 were speed kings, both at the strip and for top end. The Hayabusa was even named that because it's a falcon that kills blackbirds in Japan.
 
Before the Hayabusa, the CBR1100XX Blackbird (a name so cool I have to type it all out) and ZX-11 were speed kings, both at the strip and for top end. The Hayabusa was even named that because it's a falcon that kills blackbirds in Japan.
GSX1300R Hayabusa is also fun to type out.
 

Back
Top Bottom