Fak her right in Pus**: feminists need to suck the big one! | Page 4 | GTAMotorcycle.com

Fak her right in Pus**: feminists need to suck the big one!

The right to free speech means only that you are free to say what you wish without fear of criminal prosecution. It does not means that you are free of the civil and social consequences of others taking offence at what you say.

Good explanation.

In his employment contract there is probably a section dealing with inappropriate behaviour.
 
Poor guy. We have all done something stupid while drunk.

Yeah, I know a guy who got drunk once, and then did something stupid, drove back home, a cop pulled him over... Poor guy, had to spend close to $5,000 total to keep his license.

Seriously, not 'cause a guy is drunk means he can do whatever he wants...
 
you are absolutely right! FemiNazis are taking over the world and men are loosing more and more rights on a daily basis. Men are falsley accused on sexual/domestic abuse all the time and women win with no vidance. Men loose their jobs for false accusations. fathers loose custody of their children all the time for no reason ot fault of their own. Men loose almost everything in a divorce. Boys are harassed at schools for even looking at a girl. Men are called pigs for trying to pick up a women WHICH IS IN OUR GENES and hence why our species is still on this planet (because men are wired to pursure women). Men are constanly shown as a bunch of helpless idiots in every t.v show and movie with a strong in control woman behind them to take care of them. Mothers are alwasy praised while fathers and their love and work is dimissed.

So men ARE in fact looking everything is our FemeNazi ridden world.

All that said and while in most cases men are dealt an unjust hand, in this incident, those guys were actually harassing her and Hydro had to let them go to save face if nothing else.

But yeah, if youre a man and you dont know how sexist and biased this society is against you, then you have your head burried deep in sand. Start looking at some (even government published) stats and youll see how deep they have shafted us all in Canada!

VERY well said !


"If i was educated, I'd be a damn fool"
 
If these same men were on camera wearing leather chaps and swinging their ***** in the gay pride parade..... They probably would have got a promotion


"If i was educated, I'd be a damn fool"
 
Freedom of speech does not mean that you can say or write anything you want with impunity.

Unless you are writing anti-religion things, especially anti-Islam. Then you can say anything you want with impunity!

However

If the topic is of gay rights, anti Jewish rhetoric, or anything that displays an abundance of testosterone which offends our estrogen filled society... Then you CANNOT say anything You want with impunity!

So basically freedom of speech exist for some people and some topics but not for others.

Would everyone agree on this?


"If i was educated, I'd be a damn fool"
 
Unless you are writing anti-religion things, especially anti-Islam. Then you can say anything you want with impunity!

However

If the topic is of gay rights, anti Jewish rhetoric, or anything that displays an abundance of testosterone which offends our estrogen filled society... Then you CANNOT say anything You want with impunity!

So basically freedom of speech exist for some people and some topics but not for others.

Would everyone agree on this?


"If i was educated, I'd be a damn fool"

No one is taking away your right to practice your religion in your life. What you can't do is use your religion to dictate the rights of others which is exactly what the gay rights is about.
 
Oh my, oh my. Let me stop you right there, at #4. Charter of rights applies everywhere, not only to Crown Corporations. Or do you think it applies only to some organizations, and not to others?


oh mye. u do kno that chatter does not apply to everywhere, rite? chatter only applies to gov't, crown corp, tings that under gov't control (hospital). chatter does not apply to private busines, for instance.

i stop here, b/c obviously my words fall on someone who just wnt to argu and does not kno the law.

as someone sayd: "don't argue wit stupid. it make u look stupod too"

with my most beatiful smile, i say: goodby! :angel8:





and, and before marco say well what about public? well, if police (gov't) infringe your chatter rights, then it applies. if regular person do, no. regular person not gov't or witin gov't control--unless regular person acting as agent of state.

anyway, i go now.
 
Last edited:
You're talking about the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, right? That one?
 
oh mye. u do kno that chatter does not apply to everywhere, rite? chatter only applies to gov't, crown corp, tings that under gov't control (hospital). chatter does not apply to private busines, for instance.

i stop here, b/c obviously my words fall on someone who just wnt to argu and does not kno the law.

as someone sayd: "don't argue wit stupid. it make u look stupod too"

with my most beatiful smile, i say: goodby! :angel8:


Again, you prove with your post that your own argument is correct.
"don't argue wit stupid. it make u look stupod too"

I'll stop now.

Good bye to you too, and good luck!!
 
Hey no ones more stupider then me!

5d4b3dd6039e6ae327d0cb7433b4b890.jpg



"If i was educated, I'd be a damn fool"
 
There seems to be a lot missing.

How did he get linked back to his company.

How was he supposed to be representing them there?

What else was said?

What about the guy who actually said it on the air?

For me, when the first guy who said something like that, it was stupid, not funny.
Any copycats are also stupid.
The reporter handled it wrong. She confronted a group that she though might say something, and one of them found it amusing.
Someone had to have looked them up and linked them back for something like this to happen.
This means that others are out there now, doing the same. Things are just going to get worse and worse.
Soon, everyone will be afraid of saying something stupid, or messing up, because it will be cause for dismissal.

I believe that there's a Ted Talk on this subject.
 
Don't know if this has been brought up but...

What if the reporter was your sister, wife, or significant other?

I don't treat women like that. If someone said that to any of my close friends, mother, or sister (if I had one), they'd have a broken jaw once they're off screen.

If you're going to act like a ****ing idiot with video footage being aired...
 
油井緋色;2305116 said:
Don't know if this has been brought up but...

What if the reporter was your sister, wife, or significant other?

I don't treat women like that. If someone said that to any of my close friends, mother, or sister (if I had one), they'd have a broken jaw once they're off screen.

If you're going to act like a ****ing idiot with video footage being aired...

No, this hasn't been brought up yet. All perspectives should be on the table. Thanks for enlightenment.
 

Back
Top Bottom