Boots
Well-known member
Can't believe Ted posted that ****.Haha 890 Likes and 1680 Dislikes. Gives me some hope
Can't believe Ted posted that ****.Haha 890 Likes and 1680 Dislikes. Gives me some hope
It's not TED, its TEDX which is the fad culture version of TED with nowhere near as much regulations and strict prerequisites as TED. Thats how these militant feminists get on stage of TEDX.Can't believe Ted posted that ****.
Stumbled on this today. Seems a little over the top to me, can't have a funny slogan anymore either.
http://www.metronews.ca/news/calgar...ges-sign-after-sexism-complaints.html?ref=yfp
Do I think the business owner was trying to be sexist, not at all. Do I think he was trying to be a little cheeky and drum up a little business or make a few people laugh, yes.
I know a lot of guys sticking around in their marriage and taking abuse because they know they won't get to see their kids.
So she has a public Twitter account. Posts location on said public Twitter account. Follower rt's tweet on public Twitter account and that's what he gets charged for? Wtf?I read another article about this, what ended up getting him charged was retweeting one of her posts that had her location in it. She had asked him to stop reading her tweets, and then she tweeted something like "Im at XXX bar with my friends!" and he retweeted that. She claimed she was fearful he was going to show up and hurt her.
Basically this is a trial that will set a precedent on whether how you feel is more important than the actual law or another persons actions. Even if someone has never said anything threatening, done anything threatening, or acted in a threatening way, if you FEEL like theyre a threat to you, they can be charged and go to jail (if this guy is found guilty).
I hope he wins and sues them for slander and harrassment. He lost his job and is all over the news which is ruining his reputation because most sources are painting him in a very negative light. If anyone has actually been harmed here, it is him.
Police and logic are well known to not go together well.So she has a public Twitter account. Posts location on said public Twitter account. Follower rt's tweet on public Twitter account and that's what he gets charged for? Wtf?
They do know that retweets are how Twitter works, right?
Sent from a Samsung Galaxy far, far away using Tapatalk
What followed was that Ms. Guthrie blocked him on Twitter, but he kept on top of her movements by watching the hashtags she followed and shadowing the events she organized. She believed he was obsessed with her, in part because of her politics, but said, “It doesn’t make it any less harassing or stalking because he was obsessed with my politics”, and not, say, her looks.
That is a different woman.I read another article about this, what ended up getting him charged was retweeting one of her posts that had her location in it. She had asked him to stop reading her tweets, and then she tweeted something like "Im at XXX bar with my friends!" and he retweeted that. She claimed she was fearful he was going to show up and hurt her.
Basically this is a trial that will set a precedent on whether how you feel is more important than the actual law or another persons actions. Even if someone has never said anything threatening, done anything threatening, or acted in a threatening way, if you FEEL like theyre a threat to you, they can be charged and go to jail (if this guy is found guilty).
I hope he wins and sues them for slander and harrassment. He lost his job and is all over the news which is ruining his reputation because most sources are painting him in a very negative light. If anyone has actually been harmed here, it is him.
It was on Sept. 11 when Reilly began to be concerned for her safety, she testified. She and a group of friends met at a west-end bar and were tweeting about their evening, she testified.
“A whole lot of ugly at the Cadillac Lounge tonight,” @greg_a_elliott tweeted. The tweet made her fear that Elliott was at the same bar and search the room to make sure he was not, she said.
According to the letter, parts of which the judge read aloud in open court, the person claimed to be a former acquaintance of the three complainants and alleges they “conspired, in my presence, to fabricate a criminal harassment complaint” against Mr. Elliott.
I'm just gonna put this here
[video=youtube;5s4sZi8zjzY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5s4sZi8zjzY[/video]