I'm not sure of the ratio currently, but many employees are temps (me), our wage is $22 or less. Once hired, permanent full time it takes at least 7 years currently to break $30. We could discuss benefits/pension etc, but i don't know enough about the perks at competitors to have that discussion.
Canada Post apparently had no problems paying out management bonuses this year, last year and so on. Why is the corporation rewarding management while on the other hand lying to employees and obfuscating the ongoing issues to the public. I can tell you that we have a shortage of normal delivery trucks. I know because there's a fleet of rental RAM trucks in the parking lot and I get handed the keys to those whenever we run out. And when we run out of those I sit in the depot for 2+ hours doing nothing. Did we buy 100 EV pickup trucks? Why.
Many people should probably be fired. The one's who want to sit on their phone, do the minimum, or over retirement age with full pensions should probably be forced to part time or out.
Coming from the private sector the waste at CP is nuts. But from what I can see, unless its a safety issue management does not reward or want to entertain a conversation about improving processes. They want you to do your shift and get out.
I don't think your situation is much different in principle than other government departments, federal, provincial or municipal. The weasel factor is enormous.
Not everyone wants massive responsibilities but they do want job security. A weasel gets into the organization and works it's way up. Once it's up a level or two with the powers of annual reviews they can destroy the careers of anyone that snitches on their errors. Snitch and you get the ugly jobs and bad reviews, "not a team player."
If the job is secure and pays well, people learn to "Not notice" acts of incompetence.
Ottawa's police chief at the time of the trucker rally has weeks of lead time to come up with a plan but instead wet his pants. The big question is "Who hired him?" Their incompetence should be questioned.
Bad decisions are covered up or reworked. Blame goes to underlings.
Getting rid of people is expensive, particularly if they are system milkers that have learned how to play the cards.
The end of forced retirement is a double edged sword. While it is good for those still physically and mentally active it adds to the nanny state burden. When retirement was mandatory maybe a few people getting into their late 50's would see the writing on the wall and plan, at least a bit, for their future.
Not every company has hundreds of thousands to bail out each senior that crosses the 65 mile marker. That also means no fresh blood in the company. So industry goes to contract workers, fixed term, renegotiated yearly with no carry over of benefits, pensions etc.
Defining a reasonable settlement is subjective to the nth degree.
Morning rant over.