ducati rider
Well-known member
speaking of braking. in motogp when a racer brakes his rear tire is barely touching the ground. meaning 100% front brakes. is that really the best way to brake? just wondering...
speaking of braking. in motogp when a racer brakes his rear tire is barely touching the ground. meaning 100% front brakes. is that really the best way to brake? just wondering...
Have you hit a car before?
I have...and he is right. The way our laws are written, a good driver , who does his best to avoid the actual impact of a collision, will be found guilty of a single vehicle accident if the other driver lies thru his teeth, or high tails it outta there.
A good driver would aim for a ditch or open field instead of the car....but if you don't actually hit the other car, you will be charged for "leave roadway unsafe manner".
Same deal if you " had to lay'er down"...you fell BEFORE the impact, so the cop and car driver could argue that you were already crashing before the car was involved. They would say YOU slid into the car.
HorizonXP is 100% right.
Never lay the bike down. Crashing to avoid a crash is ridiculous. Anyone who does this is simply a bad rider, or at the very least, unprepared. You always have more opportunity, and chance to find an escape path when the bike is rolling, upright, on two wheels. WHile braking and steering, you at least have some chance of accident avoidance. The moment you succumb to "having to lay 'er down, you have 100% guaranteed that you will be involved in a crash.....and a high probability exists that you could be charged.
A bike will stop in a much shorter distance on rubber tires, than plastic and metal skimming along the asphalt......and has anyone given any thought to what may happen when the cage behind you runs your *** over when you "lay 'er down"? Human speed bump anyone?
STOLEN FROM TRIUMPHRAT BOARD:
Have you heard this before? Its a phrase used by someone who crashed a bike, and tries to justify his bad riding by explaining that in the midst of an impending accident, he elected to somehow get the bike to fall onto its side, and slide along the road - rider alongside. There's a guy at work who thinks he knows how to ride, and during discussions about biking he keeps telling me that one of the first things "they" taught him was to "lay a bike down." When I asked at lunch today what the correct technique is to physically get a motorcycle traveling upright in a straight line to suddenly fall over onto its side and slide along the road, he couldn’t answer right away. After some thought, he suggested that he would slam the rear brake on, causing the rear tire to slide, and simultaneously turn the bars to “lay her down.” I suggested that this in fact would probably induce a high side that would eject him from the bike instead. A that point he looked confused, and answered with a “well, thats what they taught me.”
“They” could be anybody - mom, dad, uncle who think they know how to ride and simply are passing on bad information.
I “laid her down” is simply another meaning for “I crashed, and the bike fell over.”
A rider should maintain control of his/her cycle at all times. Personally, I would rather bring my bike to a controlled emergency stop, before ever find myself picking it up off the ground. Good riding technique includes constant, and monitored awareness of your surroundings - adjusting your speed, position, correct gear and acceleration to avoid an emergency BEFORE it ever happens. Most modern bikes have tremendous braking power. Learn how to perform a correct, progressive emergency stop that uses the maximum potential of your front braking capacity. An upright motorcycle at maximum braking force will stop much faster that one sliding sideways on plastic and steel down a roadway. Not to mention having a 500 lb bike on top of your legs while skimming down the asphalt is going to hurt.....
I have...and he is right. The way our laws are written, a good driver , who does his best to avoid the actual impact of a collision, will be found guilty of a single vehicle accident if the other driver lies thru his teeth, or high tails it outta there.
A good driver would aim for a ditch or open field instead of the car....but if you don't actually hit the other car, you will be charged for "leave roadway unsafe manner".
Same deal if you " had to lay'er down"...you fell BEFORE the impact, so the cop and car driver could argue that you were already crashing before the car was involved. They would say YOU slid into the car.
HorizonXP is 100% right.
Never lay the bike down. Crashing to avoid a crash is ridiculous. Anyone who does this is simply a bad rider, or at the very least, unprepared. You always have more opportunity, and chance to find an escape path when the bike is rolling, upright, on two wheels. WHile braking and steering, you at least have some chance of accident avoidance. The moment you succumb to "having to lay 'er down, you have 100% guaranteed that you will be involved in a crash.....and a high probability exists that you could be charged.
A bike will stop in a much shorter distance on rubber tires, than plastic and metal skimming along the asphalt......and has anyone given any thought to what may happen when the cage behind you runs your *** over when you "lay 'er down"? Human speed bump anyone?
In the case of my accident, I _was_ speeding (probably 60-65 km/h) and the u-turn occurred about 15 feet in front of me. I've ridden bikes all my life, so instinct kicked in and emergency braking took place almost immediately. I t-boned the car near the driver's door, and my gf's weight and my weight all went forward. Guess where most of the energy was absorbed? That's right, my handlebars digging into my legs/groin.
Once that ripped clear, we were still flung over the hood and came to a mangled stop a good 20 feet from his car. I tried to get up, but of course couldn't. Your suggestion "if you're going to run into the car, RUN INTO THE CAR" makes me wince in pain, and I don't recommend that advice to anyone!
agreeI'm absolutely serious.
What speed do you think you'll contact the car if you are on the brakes? 100 km/h? 50 km/h? Unlikely. You will likely be travelling anywhere from 10-30 km/h when you contact the car, provided you were on the brakes and kept it upright.
Then what? Are you hitting the car? No, your bike's front end probably will. That's a good amount of metal and plastic that will absorb a bunch of the impact. Now, it's not like a car, which is designed with crumple zones, but it's not like our bikes are built like tanks. Your front end will shatter and go flying in a bunch of pieces, much like F1 cars do. Again, even more energy absorbed, thus not affecting you.
The remaining energy? Yeah, that'll be transferred into you somehow. That will hurt, and it will suck. But guess what? You did everything possible to stop in time, and it didn't work, and you minimized the amount of energy you absorbed.
And the shining light in all of this is that because you maintained control of your vehicle, and you hopefully had witnesses, you will not be charged. The other driver will be, and their insurance will be ponying up for the repair of your bike, and for your rehabilitation. Your insurance will remain unaffected.
I agree, it's crappy that we have to do this to be deemed not at fault, but it's the game we play and these are the rules.
Don't like it? Then by all means, slip and slide all you want. Just don't whine when you have to deal with the ticket, the insurance hike, and the repair of your bike. Oh, and the injuries you likely sustained.
Me, I'll take my chances and keep physics on my side, and keep it on 2 wheels.