Put the quality of the film aside and listen to the message...
TBH, I didnt even get the story line. It appears the film's story was very haphazard. It's either that or I can't take the film too serious to concentrate on it
Put the quality of the film aside and listen to the message...
Never under estimate the stupidity of a large group of religious extremists. This response is exactly what he wanted.. dance puppets, dance!!!
You and I share the same opinion, I think it's quite pathetic what some people will do in the name of religion.Some 10 year old girl insulted me on the internet. So I'm gonna swing by the closest elementary school and beat up all the ten year old girls??
Never under estimate the stupidity of a large group of religious extremists. This response is exactly what he wanted.. dance puppets, dance!!!
TBH, I didnt even get the story line. It appears the film's story was very haphazard. It's either that or I can't take the film too serious to concentrate on it
I can tell you exactly how he made this film, i've worked in the industry.
Notice how you see many different characters that only appear once for a few seconds and / or lines.
He made audition / casting calls for a potential film, each actor was given a small role to play, and a few lines to say.
They wouldn't be given the whole storyline.
They signed a waiver stating the film maker is allowed to use their audition tape as he wishes.
(most actors gladly agree to this, thinking it will increase their exposure or give them the break the are waiting for)
He paid for studio time and had editors piece it all together. (the owner of the studio in question was on tv, he simply provides a service, he isn't responsible for censoring peoples work)
In general, it's a total piece of piss, the fact that a whole group went crazy over it is a joke in itself.
More proof that you can't mix religions together.
Alot of the actors are shown in the media now saying they didn't know anything about the story of the film
So this is what's causing Muslims to burn embassies? So much for their idea of freedom of speech. I've seen far worse blasphemy against Christianity. Hell, even The Exorcist had more Christian blasphemy than this. I'm not religious but it comes down to picking a side, I'll choose the Bible thumpers any day.
4) Whether this film is of poor quality or not, ultimately the West seeks to undermine Islamic theology in its entirety, reducing it to a benign cultural vestige at best...."moderate Islam", non affectual, not determining, non influencial....kind of like falafel or humous. This agenda is larger than this film, and when the West promotes insulting and inciteful "free speech", over the values of Islam (which are largely disrespected by the West), the over-all message is confrontational and widely more insulting to the core beliefs of 1.4 billion people.
1) the response is wrong
2) Freedom of speech is a myth and is NOT a UNIVERSAL right. It is a localized (within reason) right. When you offend another party your rules no longer apply, instead a hybrid of common rules apply, or the victor in the ensuing battle applies the rules. This "battle" is brewing. It hasn't fully gotten underway yet.
3) Chistrian blasphemy is part of the problem: Exorcist, The Last Temptation of Christ, The Prophesy, etc etc have been part and parcel of the eroding, weakening and diluting of Christianity in modern times. Christianity is literally nothing like it was meant to be. Muslims often see what the West has done to their own faith as a precursor to what they will / can do to Islam. Citing Western pot shots at Christianity and the ultimate undermining of the Christian faith is no comfort to Muslims. Typically Muslims do not object to the objectification and slandering of Jesus (though they should) as they see Jesus as a) slandered beyond repair, and b) the current incarnation of Jesus as largely a Western idol anyways. The issue of Jesus is too big for Muslims to address, or rather Islam itself as a whole is one massive addressing of the Jesus / Issa image. Islam IS THE ULTIMATE protest to the "slander" of Jesus / Issa......just to put it in theological perspective. Muslims / Islam sees the message of Jesus so badly distorted in modern Christianity that modern slandering in the media is beyond repair or protest.
4) Whether this film is of poor quality or not, ultimately the West seeks to undermine Islamic theology in its entirety, reducing it to a benign cultural vestige at best...."moderate Islam", non affectual, not determining, non influencial....kind of like falafel or humous. This agenda is larger than this film, and when the West promotes insulting and inciteful "free speech", over the values of Islam (which are largely disrespected by the West), the over-all message is confrontational and widely more insulting to the core beliefs of 1.4 billion people.
5) Test the free speech theory out and call a police officer a pig, or curse at them. Tell a justice at your next traffic hearing to f off. Tell them their whole belief system is a farse. See if there is no reprocusion. Julian Assange leaked truth, and look at his reward! He didn't even insult anyone!
6) Oh and try denying / questioning the Holocuast in Germany or France (the Armenian Holocust either). The West will protect from insult that which it respects, and will allow slander of that which it does not....that is the underlying message that has been sent, and that has become the greater insult. What happened to Mel and Galliano again?
It is my understanding that the entire uproar involves around the inclusion of Muhammed. Apparently its a big no-no to have any type of portrayal at all, the content doesnt matter at all.
So some idiot, that might not even be from the west (as has been pointed) makes a video and posts it on youtube and suddenly it's "the west seeks" this or the west wants that?
^ Looks like me and Caboose are on the same page.
I agree with the "selective" freedom of speech though. The wiki-leaks case is a good example.
1) the response is wrong
2) Freedom of speech is a myth and is NOT a UNIVERSAL right. It is a localized (within reason) right. When you offend another party your rules no longer apply, instead a hybrid of common rules apply, or the victor in the ensuing battle applies the rules. This "battle" is brewing. It hasn't fully gotten underway yet.
3) Chistrian blasphemy is part of the problem: Exorcist, The Last Temptation of Christ, The Prophesy, etc etc have been part and parcel of the eroding, weakening and diluting of Christianity in modern times. Christianity is literally nothing like it was meant to be. Muslims often see what the West has done to their own faith as a precursor to what they will / can do to Islam. Citing Western pot shots at Christianity and the ultimate undermining of the Christian faith is no comfort to Muslims. Typically Muslims do not object to the objectification and slandering of Jesus (though they should) as they see Jesus as a) slandered beyond repair, and b) the current incarnation of Jesus as largely a Western idol anyways. The issue of Jesus is too big for Muslims to address, or rather Islam itself as a whole is one massive addressing of the Jesus / Issa image. Islam IS THE ULTIMATE protest to the "slander" of Jesus / Issa......just to put it in theological perspective. Muslims / Islam sees the message of Jesus so badly distorted in modern Christianity that modern slandering in the media is beyond repair or protest.
4) Whether this film is of poor quality or not, ultimately the West seeks to undermine Islamic theology in its entirety, reducing it to a benign cultural vestige at best...."moderate Islam", non affectual, not determining, non influencial....kind of like falafel or humous. This agenda is larger than this film, and when the West promotes insulting and inciteful "free speech", over the values of Islam (which are largely disrespected by the West), the over-all message is confrontational and widely more insulting to the core beliefs of 1.4 billion people.
5) Test the free speech theory out and call a police officer a pig, or curse at them. Tell a justice at your next traffic hearing to f off. Tell them their whole belief system is a farse. See if there is no reprocusion. Julian Assange leaked truth, and look at his reward! He didn't even insult anyone!
6) Oh and try denying / questioning the Holocuast in Germany or France (the Armenian Holocust either). The West will protect from insult that which it respects, and will allow slander of that which it does not....that is the underlying message that has been sent, and that has become the greater insult. What happened to Mel and Galliano again?
Well gee wiz! I never knew I hated Islam... thanks for the edumacation!
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk 2
Most likely if you investigate Islam in a surface manner you will hate it. I am Muslim and I can admit to the large amount of negative press it is getting lately.
It is for the most part an expansive, "universal" / absolute faith / evangelical faith. The West is correct when they speak of creeping Sharia or Islam's goal to conquer the world. There is no hiding that. But the same is true of Christianity and modern day "universal rights" / darwinian humanism. The West and Islam really are at odds with one another. Despite that there are a lot of commonalities and aspects of Islam a Westerner could like. It really depends on your take on things.
But the point I am making is that the common theme toward Islam is largely anti-Islamic, unless of course the faith can be contained so as to be "moderate" as defined by the West. Again this is the West's attempt to define what level of Islam is acceptable (world wide - not just locally).
So I can't fault anyone for hating Islam, there are enough lies, half-truths, vagueries, agendas and motivations out there for anyone to pick any theology or political inclination they wish. You can limit yourself to Fox News or some Jihadist website, it really is up to you.
As for the "religion of peace" I'll get to that apologists wet dream in another post.