You're worried about losing a bit on the 1K but are willing to shell out a bunch of cash to lower the bike, restrict the HP, mess with the braking system and any other mod that comes to mind but wont take a small loss (or savings depending on all the mods you talk about) just to sell and get her a bike that she's comfortable with. mmmmm Weighting out the cost differences might be splitting hairs at that point!
Do you know the costs? I don't...hence the investigation. Do you ever explore options before making a decision? Generally I tend to plan out all options first and make an informed choice. If I knew all the costs involved and made a direct comparison I might just sell the bike....but unless you have some hard numbers, for both mod costs and selling multiple bikes at losses costs, I doubt you have the ability to make the choice either.
Really, dude, I am asking for experienced advice here, if you don't have it....I already know your position. Thanks anyways.
Keep in mind it isn't just about selling one bike...it's multiple bikes. You don't know the difference between the sale price of my 10R and the outstanding finance. You don't also know the likelihood of selling the ninja in a market where insurance premium are increasing as they are and SS bikes are dropping in popularity.
You don't also know when and how she will acclimatize to a 250cc and move up....or not enjoy riding at all and give up! Then what do we do with a 250cc we both don't want. Investing $500 to $1000 to mod a 10R to give it a broader range of flexibility has many benefits, one of which is broadening a resale market, flexibility of options with respect to my wife's final decision on riding (she could learn very well on it, give it up and give it back to me, or it could be a shared bike). These are all potentially cost saving possibilities IF THEY RESTRICTED MOD IS POSSIBLE.
There is an IF I am investigating. Not sure if you realize that part. It is not a matter of splitting hairs...it is a matter of collecting information to make an informed decision. You may not have been aware that restricting bikes to 33bhp is quite accepted in the UK and accepted by insurers as valid when it comes to graduated licences. So it is not such a radical notion.
You may also be aware that a bike such as Aprilia's 125RS is a highly responsive track tool, but with 33bhp. It has the responsiveness of any 600R, brakes, suspension and all. Yet you would hardly get yourself in such a twist if I recommended that for a beginner rider.
The idea of a low capacity SS is not so insane....so my question revolves around the behavioral characteristics of a restricted SS engine.
If you have any info on that particular technical matter, please pitch in, otherwise you just come off as arrogant about a certain, already acknowledged matter of SS riders and noobs....we get that part already. Move on!