So because a shooting occurs NEAR a university it means that it happened on the campus??? hahah
This place is too much
Yet another shooting in the USA
- Thread starter CruisnGrrl
- Start date
So because a shooting occurs NEAR a university it means that it happened on the campus??? hahah
This place is too much
Unfortunately that's the impression media wanted to make, so the confusion is understandable.
I don't think he was suggesting there was any direct cause->effect relationship between the new law and the recent shooting.
On the other hand you seem to think that if the shooting had happened within campus property lines, then that could be used as a valid argument against liberalization of gun laws?
haha is right.
OpenGambit
Banned
another one today, cops dying this time. This will be solved with more guns!
Wont be solved with less. Neither one has anything to do with it. You really are a lawyer?
OpenGambit
Banned
a criminal is doubting me. oh noes.
That sounds sexy...a criminal....I wasnt doubting you only your abilities.
Do u think a full fledge lawyer would spend all day surfing GTAM?
Things must be really slow
Or a full-time lawyer with a clerk (articling lawyer) and secretary.
What kind of lawyer won't meet his clients?
Patent lawyer. Corporate lawyer. Research lawyer. Law professor.
shooting in south africa... stricter gun laws than canada....chickenheads please start squawking
In South Africa, owning a gun is conditional on a competency test and several other factors, including background checking of the applicant, inspection of an owner's premises, and licensing of the weapon by the police introduced in July 2004. The process is currently undergoing review,[SUP][1][/SUP] as the police are at present, not able to adequately or within reasonable time, process either competency certification, new licenses or renewal of existing licenses. Minimum waiting period frequently exceeds 2 years from date of application.[SUP][2][/SUP]
In South Africa, owning a gun is conditional on a competency test and several other factors, including background checking of the applicant, inspection of an owner's premises, and licensing of the weapon by the police introduced in July 2004. The process is currently undergoing review,[SUP][1][/SUP] as the police are at present, not able to adequately or within reasonable time, process either competency certification, new licenses or renewal of existing licenses. Minimum waiting period frequently exceeds 2 years from date of application.[SUP][2][/SUP]
Last edited:
Ready source of illegal firearms. Great disparity of wealth. Internecine tribal violence. More open laws in the past, that resulted in a large number of existing firearms.
Want to be afraid? Check their murder rates by spear and machete.
*EDIT* Peripherally about violence in South Africa: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jul/28/gutted-photographers-who-didnt-help
Last edited:
OpenGambit
Banned
says the guy who can't even figure out how to stay out of jail.
EngineerJoe
Well-known member
I don't see how discussing it will be of any benefit. Look at the discussion on this forum and try not to be disgusted at the simple-minded black-n-white arguments. How will a discussion on a national level be any less insulting to our intelligence?
I knew how to I just didn't care 22 years ago. Plus your mom dropped the rape charges anyway! Cause she love me long time.
Demonizing & prohibiting the lawful/defensive use of guns only gives advantage to violent criminals by ensuring victims will be unarmed. Creating a culture of fear of lawful guns & gun owners is counter-productive and pathetic. Who gives a flying f**k what people do with their hands? At the very least, it can be a warning sign for others that a situation needs to be diffused or avoided.
