Will the real Pierre Poilievre please stand up? | Page 29 | GTAMotorcycle.com

Will the real Pierre Poilievre please stand up?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I asked my Doc about yearly checkups years ago said they were not necessary. Then more recently once I hit the half century mark he thought we should do it....oy vey. I haven't bother following up on that, should have looked for a new doc a while ago.
Half century has a special medical ceremony.

You may want to treat your doc to a manicure beforehand.
 
Moderator public warning: I am sensing some thinly veiled racism here. It stops NOW, and I strongly recommend that a certain member go back and review some of their own posts. We're watching.

Post #416 in this thread contains an exceptionally problematic statement, and it is being submitted for review.
This is an interesting test!

Im all for moderating any post that is hateful, racist, discriminatory, or spreading misinformation. Not so much if it’s factually correct but an ugly correct truth, and not by deleting. Id prefer to see moderated posts get flagged and annotated with the reasons for moderation.

That keeps things transparent, it also makes a bad post something everyone can learn from.

Maybe post 416 should be tossed over to @Evoex … initiate the noob.
 
Pretty sure poster #416 is no noob , I think he has been around here longer than most . Actually I think longer than Evo or yourself


Sent from my iPhone using GTAMotorcycle.com
 
Evoex is the noob moderator ... think that's who he was referring to. LOL

the new guy gets the nasty jobs ...
 
New guy is on vacation, I’m sure my colleagues can cover my absence.

I would however like to echo @Brian P point
that we keep in mind as a community not everyone will take things the same way. We want to keep these boards as inclusive as possible, especially for new members. 🙂

You can always take things to PM if it’s getting heated.
 
New guy is on vacation, I’m sure my colleagues can cover my absence.

I would however like to echo @Brian P point
that we keep in mind as a community not everyone will take things the same way. We want to keep these boards as inclusive as possible, especially for new members. 🙂

You can always take things to PM if it’s getting heated.

Get a load of this guy. Gets a new job and goes on holiday a week later. He's been on holiday for more hrs then he's worked. Must be unionized.
 
Post #416 in this thread contains an exceptionally problematic statement, and it is being submitted for review.
If that's problematical for you Brian, then so is reality in general. Honestly, I thought better of you.

I even posted one of the news sources for it (guess what, most of them were foreign, not Canadian... I wonder why?) If you really want to do a deep dive on it, there's video of the conference where yellow card events happened. Anyone that wants to come at me for reporting the truth had better have a good look at it - I'm not the one being racist or sexist here, it's the NDP. It really happened.

Here, I'll be helpful:
 
Last edited:
Watched the whole vid. She DOES NOT direct white men to the back of the line. And on and on we go.
 
Watched the whole vid. She DOES NOT direct white men to the back of the line. And on and on we go.
What exactly do you think "enforce gender parity at the mics" means, Tim? Not that this was the only video I've seen, others had the actual lineup for the mic where people were yellow-carding male speakers.

Edit: Youtube has done what Youtube does, they've scoured the site of just about anything to do with this, no doubt on behalf of the NDP. Guess Rumble or one of the other sites is where we'll find the evidence.
 
One black guy then a white guy sounds like parity. She does not direct whites to the back of the line. To say that is a lie.
In this video? No. At the conference? Yes.

NDP policy convention in Hamilton devolves into SJW gong show Take a look at 5:30 when a male member tries to use the yellow card - listen to what she says. Just for added fun, note that she then says that a male that is not presenting as a man wants to use the yellow card, that person will be given priority over male-presenting people. So all any male really had to do is say they present as female and boom, in like a tick. Good fun.

There's plenty more video available on Rumble. I don't think you'll like some of the video headlines or titles so I'll leave it there. What I said in post 416 was accurate.
 
Last edited:
That wasn't it. (And for the record, I am no fan of most so-called "affirmative action" programs.)

That's a problem.
That's not a problem, it's just a fact. The Roman Empire followed by the British Empire built everything we consider to be modern. That they used innovations from other parts of the world and from other races is only tertiary to the overall. So, I don't feel that the public detestation of white men in particular as we see it in educational and some political circles today is anything but racism and should not be tolerated just like we don't tolerate other forms of racism. Yet, here we are not speaking out against it.

Hate individuals or groups all you want. The Nazis, for example, deserve detestation but not for the color of their skin - but rather, in part, for their intolerance of the colors of other's skins.
 
Watched the whole vid. She DOES NOT direct white men to the back of the line. And on and on we go.
I think she does... relisten to the language starting at about 40 seconds. It's a bit mealymouthed, but listen a few times then ask yourself what she is conveying.

Back to post 416... It's probably the closing statement that starts with "Incidentally...." That's a lot of credit being handed out to white men.
 
I think she does... relisten to the language starting at about 40 seconds. It's a bit mealymouthed, but listen a few times then ask yourself what she is conveying.

Back to post 416... It's probably the closing statement that starts with "Incidentally...." That's a lot of credit being handed out to white men.
Come on man! She DOES NOT direct white men to the back of the line. White, black, white, black is parity. The video does not show that didn't happen. You're entitled to hear what you want to hear just as I am to call out lies when I see them.
 
Come on man! She DOES NOT direct white men to the back of the line. White, black, white, black is parity. The video does not show that didn't happen. You're entitled to hear what you want to hear just as I am to call out lies when I see them.
Not my circus, not my... chess pieces.

White, black, white, black is NOT an example of parity unless there are only two whites and two blacks, AND they arrived at the lineup in white, black, white, black order.

Parity is a state of status where everyone is equal. Get in line, wait for your turn, and nobody will rearrange you based on the way you look or the group you belong to.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom