I'm forced to agree.
Toxic work colleagues
- Thread starter jc100
- Start date
I'm forced to agree.
oilycreek
Banned
The fact I stated was he didn't talk tot he Co worker about the issue. Read this then explain what you know
http://www.fiction-writers-mentor.com/objective-point-of-view.html
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk
oilycreek
Banned
I find it funny Rob, that you twice didn't read posts correctly, and yet you still try to attack me. It shows me your intent isn't proving a point but skimming the thread and making things up. I figured you were better then this, but I guess I'm wrong for once.
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk
That's fine. I came to the conclusion that you had no intent in this thread but to attack and insult the OP, long ago.
Oh, and the definition you're looking for is #3 on this list: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/objective
Last edited:
As this thread shows, there are a whole lotta GTAMers who can contribute a bunch of bad advice and irrelevant opinion.
And then there are those who are completely out of touch with reality. These space balls give the absolute worst feedback or suggestions every single time they post. Seriously, they contribute zip f-all 100% of the time. God invented 'ignore' for these people, use it wisely people.
And then there are those who are completely out of touch with reality. These space balls give the absolute worst feedback or suggestions every single time they post. Seriously, they contribute zip f-all 100% of the time. God invented 'ignore' for these people, use it wisely people.
I can't ignore ppl, I've got to say the last word
oilycreek
Banned
I really gave you too much credit before. My intentions were not to attack or insult, my intention was to tell the op crying on here isn't going to solve his problem, the only way to solve it, is to talk to the Co worker, again I thought it was self explanatory, by all my post saying exactly that. Lets recap, first you say I haven't been in charge of anything larger then a lemonade stand(wrong), then you state I said it's not a managers job( wrong again) then you state I am assuming there's a union involved ( wrong yet again) now you say my intentions were to attack and insult the op and what do you know ( wrong again) lmfao you're making Bibo look good right now. But hey you're a mod lol so that makes up for it. Enough said
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk
Actually I was insinuating that you have no apparent managerial ability, which was correct.
Actually you said that you had "... more important things to do ; when managing; then get involved in an employee dispute, especially if I only have one side of a storey." The clear implication is that you seem to think employee dispute resolution would be beneath your position, as a manager, when it is in fact a key part of the job in any organization.
You also implied that I had no managerial experience, myself, when it in fact seems to more diverse than your own and so I gave little weight to the comment.
I gave you that one. So far that's one (1).
Your first post was, in fact, an attack on the OP. It was insulting, to say the least. It was even reported as such, though I didn't note that fact until well after my own reply.
That looks like 3:1, in my favour.
Last edited:
[video=youtube_share;FsqJFIJ5lLs]http://youtu.be/FsqJFIJ5lLs[/video]
oilycreek
Banned
Lmao again you're wrong. First I have been self employed for the last 8 years, so managing is something I do very well, in fact I do it so good, I get other contractors calling me on a daily basis asking advice. Second you should learn how to read, go back and re read my post. I said the first step is to approach the other person involved and try to solve it there, and only if that doesn't work you take it to the next level. I didn't imply you didn't have any managerial experience I said your managing skills need refining, which implies you have managerial experince, but they need a bit of re working. Looks like it's 5 - 0 for me. I added extra because you really need to refine your reading skills also. Rob I used to think you were intelligent, again I state, you're making Bibo look good.
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk
I'll leave it to the readers 
I'll leave it to the readers
Mac 1 Oily 0 by my tally
I'll leave it to the readers
Never overestimate the intelligence of the readers.
vociferous
Well-known member
I have learned that arguing with Paul in here
paul doesn't want to argue. he wants to have relations.
N
Nyx13
Guest
No, I don't - and neither do 99% of the people that responded. Which is EXACTLY the point I was making. Coming here to ask isn't the advised solution - but fact is, he did. Obviously he's unsure as to the next move and considering the conflicting advice, it's not surprising. Maybe the OP has nowhere else to 'pick' people's brains...but I guess you didn't consider that. Taking it up with the co-worker doesn't seem to be working thus far either...as he already explained in his original post. He then escalated it to his superior...also to no avail. Again, all in his original post...
Last edited:
*********
Last edited:
