That doesn't change the fact that CRA can and does get grumpy about undeclared income. Once April passes, Lich will be in an interesting position. I assume she didn't spin up a grifting corporation. If there was income, that is legally required to be reported on her return. If she doesn't report it and they find a trail later, she has committed an offence. If she declares the income in april, it's possible no CRA offence occurred (although I'm not sure about HST that wasn't collected and/or income tax installments that weren't made). Sadly, CRA seems to operate on guilty until proven innocent (and god knows where their line is as many people have been raked over the coals with seemingly clean paper trails).Bad choice of words on my part.
Those people were convicted of serious charges including laundering...
Lich isn't charged with anything that serious.. nor anything related to financial /laundering crimes (not yet anyway)
Parents refuse use of vaccinated blood in life-saving surgery on baby
New Zealand’s health service has made a court application over the guardianship of a four-month-old baby whose parents are refusing to allow his life-saving heart surgery to go ahead unless non-vaccinated blood is used.
The parents of the baby discussed their son’s health situation and their medical preferences in an interview with an anti-vaccination campaigner.
In the interview the parents say their baby has severe pulmonary valve stenosis, and that he needs surgery “almost immediately”, but that they are “extremely concerned with the blood [the doctors] are going to use”.
“We don’t want blood that is tainted by vaccination,” the father said. “That’s the end of the deal – we are fine with anything else these doctors want to do.” ...
I have my doubts that they even bother to track whether the donor was vaccinated.Wondering if there is non vaccinated blood available
Buy the safest car on the market, drain the gas tank, remove the battery and park the car in a locked garage. Your crash risk is as low as it can get. Enjoying life isn't as simple. It's an odds game.On masks. COVID is endemic now.
If you're going to start wearing a mask for all of the reasons people have named, you're only going to take it off at your funeral.
If that's the case, make sure you get a course on how to put on, remove and dispose of them. Also try and keep the waste down.
Keep washing your hands, keeping your distance, staying at home when you're sick, get good ventilation and all the rest of the protocols.
Personally, I'm going to wear one some of the time, as are most of you.
I’m thinking in life or death situation, that should be the last thing someone should be worried aboutI have my doubts that they even bother to track whether the donor was vaccinated.
It's available (sort of). Not sure what kind of penetration they have/ease of actually getting a bag of blood through them. I definitely wouldn't want to rely on them if I was dying. It looks like they have just over 100 people that could give me blood in their entire database.I have my doubts that they even bother to track whether the donor was vaccinated.
Are they using this child as a political pawnIt's available (sort of).
"Since we believe that blood from Covid unvaccinated people should be a basic right for everyone "
I read about that story not long ago and for some "reason" that Guardian article doesnt explain the parents have compatible blood donors lined up but the doctors/hospital is just plain refusing use them.There is stupid then there is criminal
It can be complicated. IIRC, there are some laws around blood to prohibit donations for profit. In practice that often means that all blood must pass through a centralized agency. Doctors may also have issue with testing/typing of blood. If something is mislabeled who pays the bill for care and the funeral? The family that brings their own blood demands will 100% be the type of people to sue if outcome isn't perfect. It's not as simple as walking up with a bag of blood and telling them to use it.I read about that story not long ago and for some "reason" that Guardian article doesnt explain the parents have compatible blood donors lined up but the doctors/hospital is just plain refusing use them.
It can be complicated. IIRC, there are some laws around blood to prohibit donations for profit. In practice that often means that all blood must pass through a centralized agency. Doctors may also have issue with testing/typing of blood. If something is mislabeled who pays the bill for care and the funeral? The family that brings their own blood demands will 100% be the type of people to sue if outcome isn't perfect. It's not as simple as walking up with a bag of blood and telling them to use it.
Direct donation if compatible seems reasonable. That avoids most of the issues I raised (pay for blood, unknown origin, etc). It's the dodgy third party donation outside of current systems that is a drastic deviation. If I show up with a kidney (or give them a number to call where they are to get a kidney), docs sure as hell aren't going to put it in. There are systems in place, body parts/fluids need to travel through those systems.If a child needs a kidney, the parents can put them on a wait list or donate one themselves if compatible. I dont see much difference here. Parents are probably nut jobs but their request isnt out of this world and does everyone else a flavor by not dipping into NZblood supplies for the rest of the population that needs it.
Kid as political pawn , or spawn of a religious group that don’t vax. They are out there .
The jehova witlesses don't allow blood transfusions, full stop. You need blood? Well, it Was nice knowin' ya.