got a link to that forum? so let me get this straight, the guy rolled his car backwards causing a collision, now the driver posts it on the forum with pics showing the damage that HE caused?
and why would the video not be admissible in court? it's pretty clean cut evidence. same with surveillance cameras and etc.
No no no, sorry, the one with the camera (victim) posted the topic and the pics: http://www.toronto-subaru-club.com/forums/general/158949-why-you-need-dash-cam.html
I'm still trying to find some official documents regarding video evidence. I'm just going by what I've read on countless other forum topics regarding consumer dash cam devices. Apparently they'll only help you when dealing with the insurance companies, but are unlikely to be admissible in court.