I think I gave you logic lessons before. It happens more often with Liberal party supporters but happens often with NDP supporters as well. Here we go again. I've got a few minutes. No rhetoric, no semantics. No rewording. Just PURE LOGIC!!!! It will be broken down into it's most absolute facts! Just for you!!!!
Here's the copy/paste of 113:
Calling out the straw man argument first. What you described as capitalism is not actually capitalism. It's corporate fascism and it's much more like socialism than capitalism is.
Also, what countries that are not culturally homogeneous have successfully implemented socialism? And I won't count Argentina as a success.
Anyway, back on topic: I'M VOTING NONE OF THE ABOVE!
OR (you can buy my vote by promising to have none of the above on the ballot next election).
Originally Posted by jc100 
Good tag line....but not really. Capitalism works great....for a very few people at the top and hardly any at the bottom, a socialist leaning society works best for the majority. Like I say, the best countries in the world (according to most rankings)have socialist leaning policies. Trickle down economics works like this: some very wealthy person tells people that it works and that you too can be like him with just some hard work.....very poor people believe him but miraculously mostly stay poor despite the hard work provided at minimum wage (set mostly by more very wealthy people)....very wealthy person gets more wealthy...ad infinitum.
Do you get slackers that abuse social welfare systems? Yes. Do you think they cost you more than the uber wealthy and uber rich corporations exploiting tax loopholes and shuffling cash to offshore accounts. Think again.
We are not talking Marxist communist structures here by the way, just a more socialist leaning tendency. The more rabid crowd think that socialist tendencies = Che Guevara prancing down the street with Chairman Mao behind him confiscating property. That's also what the uber rich would like you to think a socialist leaning state would look like.
Before you go all bonkers too...most of you aren't even in this category, you're not the super wealthy this really should apply to and you probably will never be, despite how hard you
/// so to continue.
I'll just define some variables:
A = what jc100 describes as capitalism. It's actually what I call corporate fascism. Could be more generally called corporatism or some variant.
B = capitalism.
C = Socialism.
So my exact statement is
A!=B. A is A. |A-C|<|A-B|.
You are stating that I claimed B=C.
There's only 1 possible cases where that is possible. If B = C then it's possible. However I believe this to lie outside the feasible set. The proof that B!=C is left to the reader.
I will note that I did not state |A-C|<=|A-B|.
