|
|
|
The Bad Drivers of Ontario Thread
- Thread starter Boots
- Start date
I never said you shouldn't have stopped to help, and I never said anyone else shouldn't stop to help either. I said people shouldn't get involved if they see there's nothing to help with.
You said others should have stopped and I'm questioning why. Was there anything that needed help with? Should everybody in the area stop and mill around until the dramatic effect subsides? How many of them should have helped, according to you? Or is this all just an excuse to make yourself feel superior to others because you're the hero who shut off the engine?
Just make sure that stop sign you blow through doesn't have a bylaw number on it before you do. You might be in for a nasty surprise
lolwut. I don't have the energy to figure out if this even exists, but man I'd love to know the logistics and set of circumstances that would have to occur for a driver to receive this fine and then get convicted.
TiburonJA
Well-known member
The cammer is absolutely wrong but at the same time... that was funny as **** :lmao:
Have camera, will rage!
PLau
Well-known member
I never said others should have stopped, I stated, nobody else stopped and nobody witnessing the whole situation nearby offered to help.
I was just surprised that out of the 15+ people around at the time of the crash, not one would offer help. Thus making my point about why anyone would help others in need in response to "In the good old days, someone would stop and help push".
I felt that I had nothing to offer, just simple assistance in whatever way I could.
Immediately after a hard collision, nobody knows the condition of the occupants, so quickly jumping to "I'm not getting involved because there's nothing to help with" is just an excuse when there is nobody around helping especially if you're already just standing by waiting for a bus that would get stuck in the 2 blocked lanes anyway.
By saying, "I never said you shouldn't have stopped to help", you're implying I should have stopped, but by going with your analogy, I should have kept driving because I simply didn't have much to offer.
Last edited:
[video=youtube;8_D2FPdoX1w]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_D2FPdoX1w&feature=youtu.be[/video]
I82l8
Well-known member
Cammer is a jerk but suv stopped in a merge lane. you do that you deserve to be honked at. It's there so you can match the speed of the traffic you are merging with.
kiwi
Well-known member
I like this one:
heh, and a ton of people would have no clue why this is funny. (well not really, but you know). Very true for Ontario Driving
Shhh, don't let the secret out. The right lane is so much faster it's not even funny. If people spread out across all 3 lanes, we will lose our express lane.
Uh no. He stopped in a yield lane. You can even see it in the picture. Does nobody know what yield means anymore?
It doesn't mean stop dead when you have 50m to merge
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
kiwi
Well-known member
Oh yes, this does not happen on the 400... at all.
Gee, if it was actually a merge, then wouldn't it have a merge sign, and not a yield sign? C'mon.
Boots
Well-known member
He stopped for a white car that you can see pass by after cammer honks. Had he continued he would have either hit or cut off that car.
Sent from my SM-G530W using Tapatalk
Boots
Well-known member
And he had a white car flying at him that he would have cut off or hit had he merged.
Sent from my SM-G530W using Tapatalk
Camera driver was an impatient idiot.. everyone seems to drive around these days as if their agenda/driving is more important/better than anyone elses; and sorry but this thread somwhat reinforces that thought for me. Anyway, I digress. I'd take bets that this guy would loose his **** if he was the passing white car and the SUV raced to merge in front of him.. Oh the irony
That said lmfao at that attempted confrontation :lmao:
|
|
|
|
|