Ok so what does that have to do with what treyvon actually did? Is being racist against the law?
I don't believe zimmerman was a racist, but for the sake of the argument lets assume he was. So what?
Last edited:
Range Rover runs over several bikers
- Thread starter -D-
- Start date
Ok so what does that have to do with what treyvon actually did? Is being racist against the law?
I don't believe zimmerman was a racist, but for the sake of the argument lets assume he was. So what?
BTW its not the CREEPY part i was referring to....which im sure you're aware of but instead you chose to focus on something else when your point is weak.
How was he acting suspicious? "Walking while black"? Listen, you can point to however much evidence on YouTube you like but in the end a jury did not have a majority decision and facts after the case suggest they were split. That says a lot...more than you can imagine.
So now we're debating what being suspicious is?
There were break ins in the area, he was walking around and zimmerman didn't recognize him. Hoodie over his head...
Good enough reason for me. **** i've been stopped for less and im white, only difference is i didn't take it to heart and dealt with the situation like an adult instead of going postal on the other person.
Can you answer my previous questions? Otherwise this isn't a debate but a pointless rant going in circles. Thanks
As for the jury, if im ever charged with anything i hope for a judge only case, because the average person's intelligence in this world is scary.
-D-
Banned
It's interesting how the teenager is now and adult and should have known better as what to do compared to the actual adult with a gun in his pocket. The law states you must be 18-21 to be considered an adult iirc. So, because the 911 operator is not an actual police officer it's okay to ignore them when they said not to follow him. The ADULT followed the teenager first. The ADULT called 911 and was told NOT to follow, to stop. The ADULT has a gun on him and BROUGHT the GUN with him, he did not leave it in the car. So who was looking for a fight or confrontation. YOU were not there so you don't know what Zimmerman could have said to provoke the fight. He just has to call the kid N word or say you people...I was not there. Only an ADULT with a gun and a teenager with skittles was there. The ADULT with the GUN is alive. The kid/teenager is dead. See, I would say let it ride and have no issues with the case BUT the ADULT STARTED it when he followed the teenager and the ADULT brought a gun to fight with. I guess he was afraid of the bag of skittles. btw- YOU keep mentioning race. I have not once mentioned race or eluded to it.
Roomie
Banned
Ain't that the truth. It's astounding how some people even breathe or function daily.
The adult with a gun in his pocket didn't pull it out and start shooting for no reason, he only did so once treyvon was bouncing his head off the pavement, so in other words in self defence.
He possessed the gun legally, did not break ANY laws following treyvon, and from all the testimony ive watched i believe it was treyvon who started the altercation and zimmerman pulled out the gun as a last effort to save himself.
The whole thing about him having a gun therefore he was looking for a fight is nonsense. Legal gun owners are less likely to commit a crime than the average person.
I was talking to other people who constantly bring up race like thats what this was really about.
now we're talking about the Zimmerman thing? Again?
I believe this .gif is in order
Seems a large portion of us suffers from ADD :lmao:
-D-
Banned
As long as you can say that if it were your dead kid that you would accept the findings 100%. To each their own on points of view but you kinda contradicted yourself Adult vs. kid/teenager. You can't turn the kid/teenager into an adult when it's convenient. It's okay Paul. George is the one that has to sleep with one eye open and he will be followed.
No parent wants to accept that their child did something wrong, ever! Same goes if its your family member, people will side with their own family even when they are wrong.
Thats why you need someone to look at the case who has no interest in it and is not biased.
As for the whole kid vs adult, he was 17 not 8. Would him turning 18 have somehow changed anything?
And why does zimmerman have to sleep with one eye open? He went through the judicial process and was found not guilty. Why is it then that the same people who are so strongly "fighting for poor treyvon" want to break the law and hurt the other guy who had his trail and was acquitted?
Mob mentality with zero common sense. Most of these people know none of the facts yet they'll want to kill a guy just on rumours and race. THAT is racist.
But you'll never see this since you can't look at this case without bias.
What are the height/weight stats of Zimmerman and Treyvon? That could be a mitigating factor. A good number of these "children", as -D- likes to call them, are 6'+/200 lbs+.
LOL. This thread went out the window the minute it was posted.
We could change the thread title :lmao:
Roomie
Banned
To this?
It fits. The Zimmerman angle would be sub-trolling.
RandomHero
Well-known member
Ya because what happens in romper room is of such vital importance that a thread can't evolve without a super intelligent member pointing out the title needs tweaking or the crayoning will look smudged over the lines. Sad.
