Being black is a culture.. being gay is a sexual preference. THAT is the diffrence.
What it is like though is a white boy who was raised white and just found out he has a black ancester so he ran out and bought gold chains and some fubu pants.. That's just not who he is.
I have no problem with who you are.. as long as it's who you are, and not what you think you should be.
being born to a culture and a particular sexual orientation are no different, imho. you can't decide to be black or decide to be gay. if we respect 'culture' but not 'sexual orientation', that still is bigotry.
i find it problematic when as a hetero, i see other heteros using the terms 'normal' and 'acting gay' to describe gay people. why do heteros get to decide what acting 'normal' or 'gay' means? would you tell a black person to stop 'acting black' or a hetero person to stop 'acting hetero'?
why not let gay people decide for themselves what they view is 'normal', and what it means to them to 'be gay'?
maybe the pride parade on some level IS what is 'normal' for a gay person. . .
a few years back, a gay friend of mine complained openly about the very public nature of the pride parade and even used phrases like "why don't they just act normal" to describe other gay men and women. that friend was very much in the closet (not with me, as i knew the relationship they were in, and their partner), and didn't want to draw any attention to themselves.
flash forward to today, and that same person goes to pride every year, has 'come out' in public, and now is a much happier, centred person, free from the oppression of societal norms or expectations.
so i say, what is 'acting gay'? it is a meaningless term. they are who they are, and the question is whether you respect them for who they are, or don't.