... So the French should go after them?
... And you then agree with the Americans going after those in Afghanistan/Iraq following 9/11?
The Russians are in no position to do much right now. It would be nice to go back to the 1970s and tell the Americans in no uncertain terms to stop meddling in the affairs of foreign countries, but we can't.
Once again, HOW can the required results be achieved?
1) no the french armed them.. so they get to suck it up and walk away.. remember France is the second largest arms supplier to the so called rebels( including ISIS and AL-NUSRA).. they started this..french support for terrorist found its way back home.. suck it up and walk away..
2) no i don't agree.. most people don't know that the Taliban offered to have a extradition hearing where US can present its evidence to a panel of foreign impartial judges( which is a BIG DEAL to offer).. if they(judges) agreed Osama was responsible the Taliban would hand him over no questions asked.. US was offered a lawful way but it refused and WANTED to invade..Osama was just an excuse..
3) Russians are in better position then you seem to understand to SUPPORT IRANIAN/SYRIAN EFFORTS. not for active/direct combat operations.
4) WALK AWAY.. arrest those who supported this on our side with PUBLIC TRIALS..no more investigations or inquiries.. public criminal investigation with nothing being hidden under the guise of national security.. having war mongers in govt is a violation of national security.
as long as we have aggressors in power they will always support REBELS in other countries... stop supporting terrorism elsewhere and it won't find its way back to us
Last edited: