Yes... and no.
Here is the transcript of RyanF9's video which mirrors the point I was trying to make at 5:33:
Most people on here are failing to make the distinction between performance and safety. All the videos I've linked are focused on the performance aspect of the technology. All of them acknowledge these are controlled environments.
Here is an interesting interview from Aprilia's race manager talking about allowing ABS in MotoGP:
Anti-Lock Brakes are not a performance tool. They are a safety tool.
I think the hairs are being split finer and finer here as we descend into position lockdown, but I'd like to make a couple of clarifications:
- On the track, as
@42Seb points out in his excellent post above, traction isn't a issue when braking in a straight line. Where it is an issue is when trail braking into a corner, on the edge of the tire. What Bonora is advocating for above is saving those crashes, as the time between lock-up and washout is too short for most humans to react (unless your name is Marc Marquez, and even then, only sometimes). Maybe ABS kicking in there results in running wide rather than losing the front as the geometry changes, but it would keep a rider upright and in the fight. The reality is the tech is there, but it hasn't been developed because it's not good for the spectacle, just as TC had to be dialled back for fear of everyone treating the throttle like a light switch and the software engineers dictating lap times even more than they already do. To the splitting hairs part, if running a cornering ABS costs you a quarter meter braking distance on the back straight, but significantly reduces your odds of washing out the front (especially as tires wear and can perform differently without warning), I'd be very curious which would result in a higher championship standing at the end of the year.
- Similarly, in the article I wish I could find (that I swear was from the now defunct Sport Rider magazine, but it could have been something like Performance Bikes in the UK), the difference between the ABS on the S1000RR and a skilled racer working up to his shortest stops was down to a couple meters from something like 100 mph. Not arguing that ABS can stop shorter, especially under ideal conditions. I don't think that many here are saying that. But when the difference is that small, and my absolute prepared best in ideal conditions and no surprises is barely better than the every-single-time of a higher-end ABS system, then I'm going to err on pulling the lever harder than softer in a panic situation, and be very glad the ABS (and adjacent systems) is available to me. (Also, my beef with the F9 video is that they have picked a bike that provides worst-case ABS rather than best-case to magnify the disadvantage.)
None of this will stop me doing the usual practising panic stops, especially early in the season, and keeping a feel for the limit, mind...