I see a developing demand here for Osama impersonators. This is the next growth segment in the dramatic arts, invest accordingly.
Ok...now the question is what is the punishment, if there is one for such an act. Lets be thorough...is there a distinction between the west wing and the residence, if there is, what was the actual infraction. What is the actual punishment for that infraction.
Just saying "He lied so kick him out" isnt even close to legal.
The point is, conspiracy theorist love to throw out vague generalizations and use innuendo to allude to something completely irrelevant. As we know from Watergate there are far reaching implications for lying and covering it up. So no...Presidents can't out right lie about something. If Osama is legitimately found to be alive....Obama would be caught for out right lying...you really think nothing will happen to him??? The dude had to fend of idiots like Trump about his birth certificate 2 years after his win, you think they would let something like this slide? Its lunacy.
Some will read the news and others read into the news.
Some will read the news and others read into the news.
It will be fun to watch how the Chinese will handle the Pakistanis. They are going to end up in chinese hands.
i actually found this (somewhat related) article in that source to be more interesting:
http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/fatah-hamas-deal-calls-israels-bluff-5302
as far as chinese economic hegemony goes, it doesn't surprise me at all. china will eclipse the u.s. in global economic strength within our lifetimes, and will do so without ever needing to use its military might, any religious imprimatur, or political ideology.
Keep in mind that the USA has only been a superpower for about 60 years. The "West", as we define it, has only been the driving force in world development for the last 200-300 years. These are very short periods of time in human history. For the vast majority of the history of civilization, economic power was held in the Far East. India's and China's history of economic development goes back thousands of years, not hundreds. Maybe we'll go back to the normal state of affairs within our lifetimes...
as a global superpower, i think it might be a bit longer than 60 years for the u.s. they industrialized and were nascent by the '20s, pushing a political and economic ideology through the western hemisphere. ww2 and the cold war focused then diversified their geopolitical interests.
yes, historical time has a way of truncating events. the 1900s was the american century. i imagine the 2000s will be the chinese-indian century.
The US was industrialized around the turn of the century, and enjoyed a lot of prosperity in the 20s, but that doesn't mean it was a superpower. They remained an insular country with very little foreign presence until the second world war. They barely participated in the first world war, essentially being dragged into it with the sinking of the Lusitania. And they joined the second world war late, only after the bombing of pearl harbour. They didn't really want to participate in the League of Nations in the interwar years, and most people in America didn't feel they should be involved in other peoples' wars.
They didn't have much military presence in other countries, weren't involved in international affairs, and didn't even export all that much, so they weren't so much of an economic superpower. The second world war changed everything, and it was only through that experience that they became a superpower.
You would have never called 1920s - 1930s America "a superpower". Land of opportunity, maybe, but not superpower.